#FactCheck: Viral Gambhir Video Predates T20 World Cup 2026, Claim Is Misleading

Introduction:

Welcome to the second edition of our blog on Digital forensics series. In our previous blog we discussed what digital forensics is,  the process followed by the tools, and the subsequent challenges faced in the field. Further, we looked at how the future of Digital Forensics will hold in the current scenario.  Today, we will explore differences between 3 particular similar sounding terms that vary significantly in functionality when implemented: Copying, Cloning and Imaging.

In Digital Forensics, the preservation and analysis of electronic evidence are important for investigations and legal proceedings. Replication of the data and devices is one of the fundamental tasks in this domain, without compromising the integrity of the original evidence. 

Three primary techniques -- copying, cloning, and imaging -- are used for this purpose. Each technique has its own strengths and is applied according to the needs of the investigation.

In this blog, we will examine the differences between copying, cloning and imaging. We will talk about the importance of each technique, their applications and why imaging  is considered the best for forensic investigations.

Copying

Copying means duplicating data or files from one location to another. When one does copying, it implies that one is using standard copy commands. However, when dealing with evidence, it might be hard to use copy only. It is because the standard copy can alter the metadata and change the hidden or deleted data .

 The characteristics of copying include: 

• Speed: copying is simpler and faster,compared to cloning or imaging.
•  Risk: The risk involved in copying is that the metadata might be altered and all the data might be captured.

Cloning

It is the process where the transfer of the entire contents of a hard drive or a storage device is done  on another storage device. This process is known as cloning . This way, the cloning process captures both the active data and the unallocated space and hidden partitions, thus containing the whole structure of the original device. Cloning is generally used at the sector level of the device. Clones can be used as the working copy of a device .

Characteristics of cloning: 

•  bit-for-bit replication: cloning keeps the exact content and the whole structure of the original device. 
• Use cases: cloning is used when it is needed to keep the original device intact for further examination or a legal affair. 
•  Time consuming: Cloning is usually longer in comparison to simple copying since it involves the whole detailed replication. Though it depends on various factors like the size of the storage device, the speed of the devices involved, and the method of cloning.

Imaging:

It is the process of creating a forensic image of a storage device. A forensic image is a replica copy of every bit of data that was on the source device, this including the allocated, unallocated, and the available slack space .

 The image is then used for analysis and investigation, and the original evidence is left untouched. Images can’t be used as the working copies of a device.  Unlike cloning, which produces working copies, forensic images are typically used for analysis and investigation purposes and are not intended for regular use as working copies.

Characteristics of Imaging:

•  Integrity: Imaging ensures the integrity and authenticity of the evidence produced
•  Flexibility: Forensic image replicas can be mounted as a virtual drive to create image-specific mode for analysis of data without affecting the original evidence . 
• Metadata: Imaging captures metadata associated with the data, thus promoting forensic analysis.

Key Differences

• Purpose: Copying is for everyday use but not good for forensic investigations requiring data integrity. Cloning and imaging are made for forensic preservation.
• Depth of Replication: Cloning and imaging captures the entire storage device including hidden, unallocated, and deleted data  whereas copying may miss crucial forensic data.
• Data Integrity: Imaging and cloning keep the integrity of the original evidence thus making them suitable for legal and forensic use. Which is a critical aspect of forensic investigations.
• Forensic Soundness: Imaging is considered the best in digital forensics due to its comprehensive and non-invasive nature.
• Cloning is generally from one hard disk to another, where as imaging creates a compressed file that contains a snapshot of the entire hard drive or a specific partitions

Conclusion

Therefore, copying, cloning, and imaging all deal with duplication of data or storage devices with significant variations, especially in digital forensic. However, for forensic investigations, imaging is the most selected approach due to the correct preservation of the evidence state for any analysis or legal use . Therefore, it is essential for forensic investigators to understand these rigorous differences to avail of real and uncontaminated digital evidence for their investigation and legal argument.

‍

Executive Summary:

New Linux malware has been discovered by a cybersecurity firm Volexity, and this new strain of malware is being referred to as DISGOMOJI. A Pakistan-based threat actor alias ‘UTA0137’ has been identified as having espionage aims, with its primary focus on Indian government entities.  Like other common forms of backdoors and botnets involved in different types of cyberattacks, DISGOMOJI, the malware  allows the use of commands to capture screenshots, search for files to steal, spread additional payloads, and transfer files. DISGOMOJI  uses Discord (messaging service)  for Command & Control (C2)  and uses emojis  for C2 communication. This malware targets Linux operating systems.

The DISCOMOJI Malware:  

• The DISGOMOJI malware opens a specific channel in a Discord server and every new channel corresponds to a new victim. This means that the attacker can communicate with the victim one at a time.

• This particular malware connects with the attacker-controlled Discord server using Emoji, a form of relay protocol. The attacker provides unique emojis as instructions, and the malware uses emojis as a feedback to the subsequent command status.

• For instance, the ‘camera with flash’ emoji is used to screenshots the device of the victim or to steal, the ‘fox’ emoji cracks all Firefox profiles, and the ‘skull’ emoji kills the malware process.

• This C2 communication is done using emojis to ensure messaging between infected contacts, and it is almost impossible for Discord to shut down the malware as it can always change the account details of Discord it is using once the maliciou server is blocked.

• The malware also has capabilities aside from the emoji-based C2 such as network probing, tunneling, and data theft that are needed to help the UTA0137 threat actor in achieving its espionage goals.

Specific emojis used for different commands by UTA0137:

• Camera with Flash (📸): Captures a picture of the target device’s screen as per the victim’s directions.

• Backhand Index Pointing Down (👇): Extracts files from the targeted device and sends them to the command channel in the form of attachments.

• Backhand Index Pointing Right (👉): This process involves sending a file found on the victim’s device to another web-hosted file storage service known as Oshi or oshi[. ]at.

• Backhand Index Pointing Left (👈): Sends a file from the victim’s device to transfer[. ]sh, which is an online service for sharing files on the Internet.

• Fire (🔥): Finds and transmits all files with certain extensions that exist on the victim’s device, such as *. txt, *. doc, *. xls, *. pdf, *. ppt, *. rtf, *. log, *. cfg, *. dat, *. db, *. mdb, *. odb, *. sql, *. json, *. xml, *. php, *. asp, *. pl, *. sh, *. py, *. ino, *. cpp, *. java,

• Fox (🦊): This works by compressing all Firefox related profiles in the affected device. 

• Skull (💀): Kills the malware process in windows using ‘os. Exit()’

• Man Running (🏃‍♂️):  Execute a command on a victim’s device. This command receives an argument, which is the command to execute.

• Index Pointing up (👆) : Upload a file to the victim's device. The file to upload is attached along with this emoji

Analysis:   

The analysis was carried out for one of the indicator of compromised SHA-256 hash file-  C981aa1f05adf030bacffc0e279cf9dc93cef877f7bce33ee27e9296363cf002.

It is found that most of the vendors have marked the file as trojan in virustotal and the graph explains the malicious nature of the contacted domains and IPs.

‍

Discord & C2 Communication  for UTA0137:

• Stealthiness: Discord is a well-known messaging platform used for different purposes, which means that sending any messages or files on the server should not attract suspicion. Such stealthiness makes it possible for UTA0137 to remain dormant for greater periods before launching an attack.

• Customization: UTA0137 connected to Discord is able to create specific channels for distinct victims on the server. Such a framework allows the attackers to communicate with each of the victims individually to make a process more accurate and efficient.

• Emoji-based protocol: For C2 communication, emojis really complicates the attempt that Discord might make to interfere with the operations of the malware. In case the malicious server gets banned, malware could easily be recovered, especially by using the Discord credentials from the C2 server.

• Persistence: The malware, as stated above, has the ability to perpetually exist to hack the system and withstand rebooting of systems so that the virus can continue to operate without being detected by the owner of the hacked system.

• Advanced capabilities: Other features of DISGOMOJI are the Network Map using Nmap scanner, network tunneling through Chisel and Ligolo and Data Exfiltration by File Sharing services. These capabilities thus help in aiding the espionage goals of UTA0137.

• Social engineering: The virus and the trojan can show the pop-up windows and prompt messages, for example the fake update for firefox and similar applications, where the user can be tricked into inputting the password.

• Dynamic credential fetching: The malware does not write the hardcoded values of the credentials in order to connect it to the discord server. This also inconveniences analysts as they are unable to easily locate the position of the C2 server.

• Bogus informational and error messages: They never show any real information or errors because they do not want one to decipher the malicious behavior easily.

Recommendations to mitigate the risk of UTA0137:

• Regularly Update Software and Firmware: It is essential to regularly update all the application software and firmware of different devices, particularly, routers, to prevent hackers from exploiting the discovered and disclosed flaws. This includes fixing bugs such as CVE-2024-3080 and CVE-2024-3912 on ASUS routers, which basically entails solving a set of problems.

• Implement Multi-Factor Authentication: There are statistics that show how often user accounts are attacked, it is important to incorporate multi-factor authentication to further secure the accounts.

• Deploy Advanced Malware Protection: Provide robust guard that will help the user recognize and prevent the execution of the DISGOMOJI malware and similar threats.

• Enhance Network Segmentation: Utilize stringent network isolation mechanisms that seek to compartmentalize the key systems and data from the rest of the network in order to minimize the attack exposure.

• Monitor Network Activity: Scanning Network hour to hour for identifying and handling the security breach and the tools such as Nmap, Chisel, Ligolo etc can be used.

• Utilize Threat Intelligence: To leverage advanced threats intelligence which will help you acquire knowledge on previous threats and vulnerabilities and take informed actions.

• Secure Communication Channels: Mitigate the problem of the leakage of developers’ credentials and ways of engaging with the discord through loss of contact to prevent abusing attacks or gaining control over Discord as an attack vector.

• Enforce Access Control: Regularly review and update the user authentication processes by adopting stricter access control measures that will allow only the right personnel to access the right systems and information.

• Conduct Regular Security Audits: It is important to engage in security audits periodically in an effort to check some of the weaknesses present within the network or systems.

• Implement Incident Response Plan: Conduct a risk assessment, based on that design and establish an efficient incident response kit that helps in the early identification, isolation, and management of security breaches.

• Educate Users: Educate users on cybersecurity hygiene, opportunities to strengthen affinity with the University, and conduct retraining on threats like phishing and social engineering.

Conclusion:

The new threat actor named UTA0137 from Pakistan who was utilizing DISGOMOJI malware to attack Indian government institutions using embedded emojis with a command line through the Discord app was discovered by Volexity. It has the capability to exfiltrate and aims to steal the data of government entities. The UTA0137 was continuously improved over time to permanently communicate with victims. It underlines the necessity of having strong protection from viruses and hacker attacks, using secure passwords and unique codes every time, updating the software more often and having high-level anti-malware tools. Organizations can minimize advanced threats, the likes of DISGOMOJI and protect sensitive data by improving network segmentation, continuous monitoring of activities, and users’ awareness.

References:

https://otx.alienvault.com/pulse/66712446e23b1d14e4f293eb

https://thehackernews.com/2024/06/pakistani-hackers-use-disgomoji-malware.html?m=1

https://cybernews.com/news/hackers-using-emojis-to-command-malware/

https://www.blackhatethicalhacking.com/news/disgomoji-new-linux-malware-uses-emojis-for-command-execution/

https://www.volexity.com/blog/2024/06/13/disgomoji-malware-used-to-target-indian-government/

‍

As technological advancements continue to shape the future, the rise of artificial intelligence brings with it significant potential benefits, yet also raises concerns about the spread of misinformation. Recognising the need for accountability on both ends, on 5th May, during the three-day World News Media Congress 2025 in Kraków, Poland the European Broadcasting Union (EBU) and the World Association of News Publishers (WAN-IFRA) have announced to the public the five core principles for their joint initiative called News Integrity in the Age of AI. The initiative is aimed at fostering dialogue and cooperation between media organisations and technology platforms, and the principles announced are to be a code of practice to be followed by all those taking part. With thousands of public and private media outlets around the world joining the effort, the initiative highlights the shared responsibility of AI developers to ensure that AI systems are trustworthy, safe, and supportive of a reliable news ecosystem. It represents a global call to action to uphold the integrity of news in this age of major influx and curb the growing challenge of misinformation.

‍

The five core principles released focus on:

‍

1. Authorisation of content by the originators is a must prior to its usage in Generative AI tools and models

2. High-quality and up-to-date news content must be recognised by third parties that are benefiting from it

3. There must be a focus on accuracy and attribution, making the original sources of news  apparent to the public, promoting transparency

4. Harnessing the plural nature of the news perspectives, which will help AI-driven tools perform better and

5. An invitation to tech companies for an open dialogue with news outlets, facilitating conversation to collaborate and develop standards of transparency, accuracy, and safety.

‍

As this initiative provides a unified platform to address and deliberate on issues affecting the integrity of news, there are also some other technical ways in which misinformation in news caused by AI can be curbed:

‍

1. Encourage the usage of Smaller Generative AI Models: The Large Language Models (LLMs) have to be trained on a range of topics. Businesses don’t require such an expanse of information but just a little that is relevant. A narrower context of information to be sourced from allows better content navigation and a reduced chance of mix-up.

2. Fighting AI hallucination: This is a phenomenon that causes generative AI (such as chatbots and computer vision tools) to present nonsensical and inaccurate outputs as the system perceives objects or patterns that are imperceptible or non-existent to human observers. This occurs as a result of the system trying to focus on both language fluency and stitching information from different sources together. In order to deal with this, one can deploy retrieval augmented generation (RAG). This enables connection with external sources of data that include academic journals, a company’s organisational data, among other things, that would help in providing more accurate, domain-specific content.  

Conclusion

This global call to action marks an important step toward fostering unified efforts to combat misinformation. The set of principles introduced is designed to be adaptable, providing a flexible framework that can evolve to address emerging challenges (through dialogue and discussion), including issues like copyright infringement. While AI offers powerful tools to support the news industry, it is essential to emphasise that human oversight remains crucial. These technological advancements are meant to enhance and augment the work of journalists, not replace it, ensuring that the core values of journalism, such as accuracy and integrity, are preserved in the age of AI.

References

● https://www.techtarget.com/searchenterpriseai/tip/Generative-AI-ethics-8-biggest-concerns

● https://trilateralresearch.com/responsible-ai/using-responsible-ai-to-combat-misinformation

● https://www.omdena.com/blog/the-ethical-role-of-ai-in-media-combating-misformation

● https://2024.jou.ufl.edu/page/ai-and-misinformation

● https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/technology/ai-developers-should-counter-misinformation-protect-fact-based-news-global-media-groups/article69547636.ece

● https://techxplore.com/news/2025-05-ai-counter-misinformation-fact-based.html

● https://www.advanced-television.com/2025/05/06/media-outlets-call-for-ai-companies-news-integrity-protection/https://www.ibm.com/think/insights/ai-misinformation

‍