#FactCheck : Edited video falsely claims Dr. Vikas Divyakirti targeted Narendra Modi
Executive Summary
A video circulating on social media shows Dr. Vikas Divyakirti speaking during a podcast, where he is heard saying, “Those who cannot even memorise and speak four sentences are considered the greatest in India.” Several users are sharing the clip claiming that the remark was aimed at Narendra Modi. However, a research by CyberPeace found the claim to be misleading. The research revealed that the viral clip has been edited and shared out of context. In the original video, Divyakirti made the remarks in reference to film stars, not the Prime Minister.
Claim
On Facebook, a user shared the viral clip with an English caption alleging that Divyakirti criticised Modi, saying he cannot speak without a teleprompter or scripted interviews and has built a false image of greatness.

Similarly, another user shared the video on X, suggesting that people who cannot speak without a teleprompter are still considered great in India, indirectly linking the remark to Modi.

Fact Check
To verify the claim, we extracted keyframes from the viral video and conducted a reverse image search using Google Lens. This led us to the original video uploaded on the official YouTube channel of Raj Shamani.

At around the 3:55 mark, the same clip can be seen. During the conversation, Shamani asks whether building a larger-than-life perception actually benefits an individual. Responding to this, Dr. Vikas Divyakirti explains that film stars often have an exaggerated public image. He notes that many of the dialogues they are praised for are not written by them, but by others, and some even rely on teleprompters while speaking. He further adds that there are individuals who cannot even memorise and deliver four sentences or think independently, yet are regarded as great in India. He also mentions that many social media personalities use teleprompters, but audiences remain unaware and assume they possess exceptional knowledge.
Conclusion
The viral claim is misleading. The video has been edited and shared out of context. Dr. Vikas Divyakirti was referring to film stars and social media personalities, not Narendra Modi.
Related Blogs

Executive Summary:
A viral thumbnail and numerous social posts state that the government of India is giving unemployed youth ₹4,500 a month under a program labeled "PM Berojgari Bhatta Yojana." This claim has been shared on multiple online platforms.. It has given many job-seeking individuals hope, however, when we independently researched the claim, there was no verified source of the scheme or government notification.

Claim:
The viral post states: "The Central Government is conducting a scheme called PM Berojgari Bhatta Yojana in which any unemployed youth would be given ₹ 4,500 each month. Eligible candidates can apply online and get benefits." Several videos and posts show suspicious and unverified website links for registration, trying to get the general public to share their personal information.

Fact check:
In the course of our verification, we conducted a research of all government portals that are official, in this case, the Ministry of Labour and Employment, PMO India, MyScheme, MyGov, and Integrated Government Online Directory, which lists all legitimate Schemes, Programmes, Missions, and Applications run by the Government of India does not posted any scheme related to the PM Berojgari Bhatta Yojana.

Numerous YouTube channels seem to be monetizing false narratives at the expense of sentiment, leading users to misleading websites. The purpose of these scams is typically to either harvest data or market pay-per-click ads that suspend disbelief in outrageous claims.
Our research findings were backed up later by the PIB Fact Check which shared a clarification on social media. stated that: “No such scheme called ‘PM Berojgari Bhatta Yojana’ is in existence. The claim that has gone viral is fake”.

To provide some perspective, in 2021-22, the Rajasthan government launched a state-level program under the Mukhyamantri Udyog Sambal Yojana (MUSY) that provided ₹4,500/month to unemployed women and transgender persons, and ₹4000/month to unemployed males. This was not a Central Government program, and the current viral claim falsely contextualizes past, local initiatives as nationwide policy.

Conclusion:
The claim of a ₹4,500 monthly unemployment benefit under the PM Berojgari Bhatta Yojana is incorrect. The Central Government or any government department has not launched such a scheme. Our claim aligns with PIB Fact Check, which classifies this as a case of misinformation. We encourage everyone to be vigilant and avoid reacting to viral fake news. Verify claims through official sources before sharing or taking action. Let's work together to curb misinformation and protect citizens from false hopes and data fraud.
- Claim: A central policy offers jobless individuals ₹4,500 monthly financial relief
- Claimed On: Social Media
- Fact Check: False and Misleading

Introduction
Picture every paper trade document, such as bills of lading, certificates of origin, letters of credit, and packing lists, stacked one on top of another. By one industry estimate, the roughly four billion such documents in circulation each year would form a tower over 500 kilometres high, well past the edge of space. This absurd image reflects a simple truth, global trade has relied on paper for centuries, making transactions slow, expensive, and vulnerable to loss, forgery, and disputes.
Today, however, we complete many activities that once depended on paper through digital platforms. We open bank accounts through mobile applications, sign contracts electronically, file taxes online, and access government services through websites, all without handling a single physical document. Global trade is now undergoing a similar transformation. Yet, as trade moves online, the challenge is no longer managing stacks of paper, but protecting digital trade from cyber threats. The success of this transition will therefore depend as much on robust cybersecurity as on the adoption of digital technologies.
From Paper Trails to Platforms
For decades, an Indian exporter clearing a container needed physical stamps from customs, port authorities, banks, and multiple regulatory agencies, each on its own timeline. That has been changing under India's National Trade Facilitation Action Plan, now in its third iteration (NTFAP 3.0, 2024–27), which set out to close the remaining gaps in paperless trading systems. The shift shows up in international benchmarks: India's score on the UN's Global Survey on Digital and Sustainable Trade Facilitation has climbed sharply, with the institutional-cooperation component alone improving from under 67% to nearly 89% in recent rounds. A 2026 policy brief jointly released by ICRIER, RIS, and the Centre for WTO Studies concludes that India has achieved full implementation of domestic paperless trade measures, a rare distinction globally even as cross-border digitalisation continues to deepen.
The Building Blocks: ICEGATE to BharatTradeNet
This transformation rests on a stack of interlocking platforms. ICEGATE, the customs electronic data-interchange gateway, lets traders file declarations digitally rather than in person. SWIFT, the Single Window Interface for Facilitating Trade, connects multiple regulatory agencies so a trader deals with one portal instead of dozens. e-SANCHIT digitises supporting documents for customs clearance, cutting paperwork once attached to every consignment. Faceless assessment, rolled out under the CBIC's "Turant Customs" push, separates the assessing officer from the physical location of the goods, reducing scope for delay and discretion. The newest addition, BharatTradeNet, announced in the Union Budget 2025-26, is unified digital public infrastructure linking DGFT, GSTN, banks, shipping lines, and exporters on one platform for trade documentation and financing built to complement the Unified Logistics Interface Platform and align with international conventions.
None of this works without a legal backbone. India's proposed Trade Facilitation Bill aims to give electronic trade documents the same legal standing as paper ones, closing an interoperability gap that has long complicated cross-border recognition of digital records. Recent trade agreements have also begun embedding firmer commitments on paperless trade, a sign that digitalisation is no longer a back-office IT project but a live item in trade diplomacy.
What's at Stake Economically
The economic case is straightforward: paper costs money and time. Digitised customs and documentation shrink dwell times at ports, cut transaction costs, and reduce the discretion-driven delays that disproportionately hurt smaller firms. That matters for India's MSMEs, whose export contribution has grown from roughly ₹3.95 lakh crore to ₹12.39 lakh crore in recent years, aided by platforms such as the Government e-Marketplace and ONDC, which together have onboarded well over a million sellers. Electronics exports touched a record $47 billion in 2025, helped along by production-linked incentives and smoother compliance. With India's total merchandise exports crossing $714 billion in the first ten months of FY 2025-26, the efficiency gains from digitalisation compound across an ever-larger base and help Indian firms plug into global value chains that increasingly expect real-time, verifiable documentation rather than faxed certificates.
India's Regional Moment
Beyond its own backyard, India has regional aspirations. Following deliberations at the Asia-Pacific Trade Facilitation Forum and Paperless Trade Week 2026 in Bangkok last May, international experts were of the opinion that most of the necessary digital and regulatory infrastructure for India to join the UN Framework Agreement on Facilitation of Cross-Border Paperless Trade in Asia and the Pacific (CPTA – a treaty-based and intended to make paperless trade globally, not just internationally, interoperable) had been laid in place. Joining CPTA will also allow India to have a say on digital trade frameworks in the region and thus be a game-changer in integrating SAARC, ASEAN and global supply chains together while reducing costs of trade.
The Cybersecurity Imperative
The catch is that every portal, system and API that takes the place of a paper stamp has the potential to become an attack vector. The increase in overall ransomware activity reached more than 50% worldwide in 2025, and supply-chain attacks almost doubled. These types of attacks hit manufacturing, now a key part of India's export basket, hardest of all industrial ransomware attacks.
The notorious NotPetya attack in 2017, which effectively brought Maersk's worldwide shipping operations to a halt and shut down container movement at Mumbai's Jawaharlal Nehru Port, serves as a painful reminder that the compromise of even a single system can bring physical cargo movement within a network to a standstill.
For a trade ecosystem running on digital trust, the nature of risks include: ransomware that immobilizes ports and customs systems, supply-chain attacks that leverage a single trusted service provider to get access to dozens of downstream clients, data theft revealing shipment and financial data, impostor fraud to trick people into assuming the identity of a banks or exporter, modification of digital bills of lading, certificates of origin or other essential trade documents. When an original physical document is misplaced, it has no effect on anyone but its keeper. A corrupted digital file, on the other hand, can be stealthily changed and propagate across every system it touches instantly.
Building Trust by Design
It is a prerequisite to digital commerce to have these systems so they can even be trusted. This means a zero-trust architecture where all users and devices are authenticated rather than just assumed to be safe once you cross an organisational boundary; transport-level encryption; digital signatures & PKI for crypto-validating shipping documents; identity & access controls ensuring access to shipment data is limited to authorised persons; and anomaly detection to alert on intrusions before the problems can snowball. India's legal & policy framework for cybersecurity is indeed evolving, with the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (and its rules finalised Jan 2025) obligating data fiduciaries & stipulating breaches must be reported within 6 hours to CERT-In; the National Cyber Security Reference Framework provides a foundational blueprint for digital public infrastructure, all under the stewardship of the National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre, which monitors systems vital for the functioning of commerce.
Conclusion
India's digitised trade infrastructure from ICEGATE and SWIFT to e-SANCHIT, BharatTradeNet, and faceless customs has effectively brought it into the running for the title of regional digital trade leader. However, the success of this transformation will ultimately be measured not by the number of digital platforms it deploys, but by the trust, security, and resilience of the ecosystem that supports them. As trade becomes increasingly digital, robust cybersecurity will remain the foundation for protecting commercial data, maintaining confidence among trading partners, and ensuring that India's digital trade ambitions translate into sustainable economic growth.
Sources
- Cyble — Ransomware Attacks and Supply Chain Threats in 2025
- Chambers and Partners — Cybersecurity 2026: India
- Drishti IAS — Key Cyberthreats India is Facing and Key Measures India has Adopted to Strengthen Cybersecurity
- Protium — MSME Export Contribution Has Grown from ₹3.95 Lakh Crore to ₹12.39 Lakh Crore
- IBEF — India's E-commerce Boom: Growth, Trends & Future Prospects
- News on Air — India Achieves Record Electronics Exports of $47 Billion in 2025

Introduction
The ongoing debate on whether AI scaling has hit a wall has been rehashed by the underwhelming response to OpenAI’s ChatGPT v5. AI scaling laws, which describe that machine learning models perform better with increased training data, model parameters and computational resources, have guided the rapid progress of Large Language Models (LLMs) so far. But many AI researchers suggest that further improvements in LLMs will have to be effected through large computational costs by orders of magnitude, which does not justify the returns. The question, then, is whether scaling remains a viable path or whether the field must explore new approaches. This is not just a tech issue but a profound innovation challenge for countries like India, charting their own AI course.
The Scaling Wall: Gaps and Innovation Opportunities
Escalating costs, data scarcity, and diminishing gains mean that simply building larger AI models may no longer guarantee breakthroughs. In such a scenario, LLM developers will have to refine new approaches to training these models, for example, by diversifying data types and redefining training techniques.
This global challenge has a bearing on India’s AI ambitions. For India, where compute and data resources are relatively scarce, this scaling slowdown poses both a challenge and an opportunity. While the India AI Mission embodies smart priorities such as democratising compute resources and developing local datasets, looming scaling challenges could prove a roadblock. Realising these ambitions requires strong input from research and academia, and improved coordination between policymakers and startups. The scaling wall highlights systemic innovation gaps where sustained support is needed, not only in hardware but also in talent development, safety research, and efficient model design.
Way Forward
To truly harness AI’s transformative power, India must prioritise policy actions and ecosystem shifts that support smarter, safer, and context-rich research through the following measures:
- Driving Efficiency and Compute Innovation: Instead of relying on brute-force scaling, India should invest in research and startups working on efficient architectures, energy-conscious training methods, and compute optimisation.
- Investing in Multimodal and Diverse Data: While indigenous datasets are being developed under the India AI Mission through AI Kosha, they must be ethically sourced from speech, images, video, sensor data, and regional content, apart from text, to enable context-rich AI models truly tailored to Indian needs.
- Addressing Core Problems for Trustworthy AI: LLMs offered by all major companies, like OpenAI, Grok, and Deepseek, have the problem of unreliability, hallucinations, and biases, since they are primarily built on scaling large datasets and parameters, which have inherent limitations. India should invest in capabilities to solve these issues and design more trustworthy LLMs.
- Supporting Talent Development and Training: Despite its substantial AI talent pool, India faces an impending demand-supply gap. It will need to launch national programs and incentives to upskill engineers, researchers, and students in advanced AI skills such as model efficiency, safety, interpretability, and new training paradigms
Conclusion
The AI scaling wall debate is a reminder that the future of LLMs will depend not on ever-larger models but on smarter, safer, and more sustainable innovation. A new generation of AI is approaching us, and India can help shape its future. The country’s AI Mission and startup ecosystem are well-positioned to lead this shift by focusing on localised needs, efficient technologies, and inclusive growth, if implemented effectively. How India approaches this new set of challenges and translates its ambitions into action, however, remains to be seen.
References
- https://blogs.nvidia.com/blog/ai-scaling-laws/
- https://www.marketingaiinstitute.com/blog/scaling-laws-ai-wall
- https://fortune.com/2025/02/19/generative-ai-scaling-agi-deep-learning/
- https://indiaai.gov.in/
- https://www.deloitte.com/in/en/about/press-room/bridging-the-ai-talent-gap-to-boost-indias-tech-and-economic-impact-deloitte-nasscom-report.html