#FactCheck - "Viral Video Falsely Claimed as Evidence of Attacks in Bangladesh is False & Misleading”
Executive Summary:
A misleading video of a child covered in ash allegedly circulating as the evidence for attacks against Hindu minorities in Bangladesh. However, the investigation revealed that the video is actually from Gaza, Palestine, and was filmed following an Israeli airstrike in July 2024. The claim linking the video to Bangladesh is false and misleading.
Claims:
A viral video claims to show a child in Bangladesh covered in ash as evidence of attacks on Hindu minorities.
Fact Check:
Upon receiving the viral posts, we conducted a Google Lens search on keyframes of the video, which led us to a X post posted by Quds News Network. The report identified the video as footage from Gaza, Palestine, specifically capturing the aftermath of an Israeli airstrike on the Nuseirat refugee camp in July 2024.
The caption of the post reads, “Journalist Hani Mahmoud reports on the deadly Israeli attack yesterday which targeted a UN school in Nuseirat, killing at least 17 people who were sheltering inside and injuring many more.”
To further verify, we examined the video footage where the watermark of Al Jazeera News media could be seen, We found the same post posted on the Instagram account on 14 July, 2024 where we confirmed that the child in the video had survived a massacre caused by the Israeli airstrike on a school shelter in Gaza.
Additionally, we found the same video uploaded to CBS News' YouTube channel, where it was clearly captioned as "Video captures aftermath of Israeli airstrike in Gaza", further confirming its true origin.
We found no credible reports or evidence were found linking this video to any incidents in Bangladesh. This clearly implies that the viral video was falsely attributed to Bangladesh.
Conclusion:
The video circulating on social media which shows a child covered in ash as the evidence of attack against Hindu minorities is false and misleading. The investigation leads that the video originally originated from Gaza, Palestine and documents the aftermath of an Israeli air strike in July 2024.
- Claims: A video shows a child in Bangladesh covered in ash as evidence of attacks on Hindu minorities.
- Claimed by: Facebook
- Fact Check: False & Misleading
Related Blogs
Over the last decade, battlefields have percolated from mountains, deserts, jungles, seas, and the skies into the invisible networks of code and cables. Cyberwarfare is no longer a distant possibility but today’s reality. The cyberattacks of Estonia in 2007, the crippling of Iran’s nuclear program by the Stuxnet virus, the SolarWinds and Colonial Pipeline breaches in recent years have proved one thing: that nations can now paralyze economies and infrastructures without firing a bullet. Cyber operations now fall beyond the traditional threshold of war, allowing aggressors to exploit the grey zone where full-scale retaliation may be unlikely.
At the same time, this ambiguity has also given rise to the concept of cyber deterrence. It is a concept that has been borrowed from the nuclear strategies during the Cold War era and has been adapted to the digital age. At the core, cyber deterrence seeks to alter the adversary’s cost-benefit calculation that makes attacks either too costly or pointless to pursue. While power blocs like the US, Russia, and China continue to build up their cyber arsenals, smaller nations can hold unique advantages, most importantly in terms of their resilience, if not firepower.
Understanding the concept of Cyber Deterrence
Deterrence, in its classic sense, is about preventing action through the fear of consequences. It usually manifests in four mechanisms as follows:
- Punishment by threatening to impose costs on attackers, whether by counter-attacks, economic sanctions, or even conventional forces.
- Denial of attacks by making them futile through hardened defences, and ensuring the systems to resist, recover, and continue to function.
- Entanglement by leveraging interdependence in trade, finance, and technology to make attacks costly for both attackers and defenders.
- Norms can also help shape behaviour by stigmatizing reckless cyber actions by imposing reputational costs that can exceed any gains.
However, great powers have always emphasized the importance of punishment as a tool to showcase their power by employing offensive cyber arsenals to instill psychological pressure on their rivals. Yet in cyberspace, punishment has inherent flaws.
The Advantage of Asymmetry
For small states, smaller geographical size can be utilised as a benefit. Three advantages of this exist, such as:
- With fewer critical infrastructures to protect, resources can be concentrated. For example, Denmark, with a modest population of $40 million cyber budget, is considered to be among the most cyber-secure nations, despite receiving billions of US spending.
- Smaller bureaucracies enable faster response. The centralised cyber command of Singapore allows it to ensure a rapid coordination between the government and the private sector.
- Smaller countries with lesser populations can foster a higher public awareness and participation in cyber hygiene by amplifying national resilience.
In short, defending a small digital fortress can be easier than securing a sprawling empire of interconnected systems.
Lessons from Estonia and Singapore
The 2007 crisis of Estonia remains a case study of cyber resilience. Although its government, bank, and media were targeted in offline mode, Estonia emerged stronger by investing heavily in cyber defense mechanisms. Another effort in this case stood was with the hosting of NATO’s Cooperative Cyber Defence Centre of Excellence to build one of the world’s most resilient e-governance models.
Singapore is another case. Where, recognising its vulnerability as a global financial hub, it has adopted a defense-centric deterrence strategy by focusing on redundancy, cyber education, and international partnership rather than offensive capacity. These approaches can also showcase that deterrence is not always about scaring attackers with retaliation, it is about making the attacks meaningless.
Cyber deterrence and Asymmetric Warfare
Cyber conflict is understood through the lens of asymmetric warfare, where weaker actors exploit the unconventional and stronger foes. As guerrillas get outmanoeuvred by superpowers in Vietnam or Afghanistan, small states hold the capability to frustrate the cyber giants by turning their size into a shield. The essence of asymmetric cyber defence also lies in three principles, which can be mentioned as;
- Resilience over retaliation by ensuring a rapid recovery to neutralise the goals of the attackers.
- Undertaking smart investments focusing on limited budgets over critical assets, not sprawling infrastructures.
- Leveraging norms to shape the international opinions to stigmatize the aggressors and increase the reputational costs.
This also helps to transform the levels of cyber deterrence into a game of endurance rather than escalating it into a domain where small states can excel.
There remain challenges as well, as attribution problems persist, the smaller nations still depend on foreign technology, which the adversaries have sought to exploit. Issues over the shortage of talent have plagued the small states, as cyber professionals have migrated to get lucrative jobs abroad. Moreover, building deterrence capability through norms requires active multilateral cooperation, which may not be possible for all small nations to sustain.
Conclusion
Cyberwarfare represents a new frontier of asymmetric conflict where size does not guarantee safety or supremacy. Great powers have often dominated the offensive cyber arsenals, where small states have carved their own path towards security by focusing on defence, resilience, and international collaboration. The examples of Singapore and Estonia demonstrate the fact that the small size of a state can be its identity of a hidden strength in capabilities like cyberspace, allowing nimbleness, concentration of resources and societal cohesion. In the long run, cyber deterrence for small states will not rest on fearsome retaliation but on making attacks futile and recovery inevitable.
References
- https://bluegoatcyber.com/blog/asymmetric-warfare/
- https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2268&context=jss
- https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/rising-tide-cyberwarfare-battle-between-superpowers-hussain/
- https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1243&context=gpis_etds
- https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=141708
- https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1243&context=gpis_etds
A video circulating widely on social media claims to show former US President Donald Trump issuing a threat to India over its relationship with Russia. In the clip, Trump is allegedly heard warning New Delhi that if it does not cut bilateral ties with Moscow, the United States would “treat India the same way Pakistan did during the May war.”
The reference to the “May war” appears to point to the India-Pakistan military escalation in May 2025, which followed the Pahalgam terror attack and India’s retaliatory strikes under Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure.
However, research done by the Cyber Peace Foundation has found that the video is misleading and digitally manipulated.
The visuals used in the viral clip are genuine and were taken from a press briefing addressed by Donald Trump on January 3, 2026. However, the audio track accompanying the video has been fabricated and falsely superimposed to
misrepresent his remarks. In the original address, Trump was speaking about a US-led military operation in Caracas that reportedly resulted in the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. He made no reference to India, Russia, or any geopolitical warning involving New Delhi.
Claim:
On January 10, an X (formerly Twitter) user, Niki Chiri (@cutehunmee), shared a video claiming it showed Donald Trump threatening India over its ties with Russia.
In the clip, Trump is purportedly heard stating that unless India severed its relationship with Moscow, the United States would respond in a manner similar to Pakistan’s actions during the May conflict.
The post quickly gained traction, with several users amplifying the claim. Iink,archive link and screenshot
Research:
To verify the authenticity of the video, the Cyber Peace Foundation conducted a reverse image and video analysis. A Google Lens search led investigators to a longer version of the same footage uploaded on the official YouTube channel of The Wall Street Journal, a prominent US-based news outlet.
A comparison confirmed that both videos shared identical visuals, background elements, and camera angles, establishing that the viral clip was sourced from the same press address.
A review of the full speech, however, showed that Trump did not issue any warning to India, nor did he mention Russia or the May conflict. His remarks were strictly focused on developments in Venezuela.
This confirmed that the viral video had been digitally altered. Here is the link to the original video, along with a screenshot:
In the next phase of the research, the audio track from the viral clip was extracted and analysed using the AI-based voice detection tool Aurigin. The results indicated a high likelihood that the voice in the video was artificially generated, further confirming that the audio did not originate from Trump’s original speech. A screenshot of the result is provided below.
Conclusion
The claim that a video shows Donald Trump threatening India over its ties with Russia is false. The Cyber Peace Foundation found that while the visuals were taken from a real press address, the audio was fabricated and overlaid to falsely attribute threatening statements to Trump. The manipulated video was circulated online to mislead viewers and spread disinformation.
Introduction
According to a shocking report, there are multiple scam loan apps on the App Store in India that charge excessive interest rates and force users to pay by blackmailing and harassing them. Apple has prohibited and removed these apps from the App Store, but they may still be installed on your iPhone and running. You must delete any of these apps if you have downloaded them. Learn the names of these apps and how they operated the fraud.
Why Apple banned these apps?
- Apple has taken action to remove certain apps from the Indian App Store. These apps were engaging in unethical behaviour, such as impersonating financial institutions, demanding high fees, and threatening borrowers. Here are the titles of these apps, as well as what Apple has said about their suspension.
- Following user concerns, Apple removed six loan apps from the Indian App Store. Loan apps include White Kash, Pocket Kash, Golden Kash, Ok Rupee, and others.
- According to multiple user reviews, certain apps seek unjustified access to users’ contact lists and media. These apps also charge exorbitant fees that are not necessitated. Furthermore, companies have been found to engage in unethical tactics such as charging high-interest rates and “processing fees” equal to half the loan amount.
- Some lending app users have reported being harassed and threatened for failing to return their loans on time. In some circumstances, the apps threatened the user’s contacts if payment was not completed by the deadline. According to one user, the app company threatened to produce and send false photographs of her to her contacts.
- These loan apps were removed from the App Store, according to Apple, because they broke the norms and standards of the Apple Developer Program License Agreement. These apps were discovered to be falsely claiming financial institution connections.
Issue of Fake loan apps on the App Store
- The App Store and our App Review Guidelines are designed to ensure we provide our users with the safest experience possible,” Apple explained. “We do not tolerate fraudulent activity on the App Store and have strict rules against apps and developers who attempt to game the system.
- In 2022, Apple blocked nearly $2 billion in fraudulent App Store sales. Furthermore, it rejected nearly 1.7 million software submissions that did not match Apple’s quality and safety criteria and cancelled 428,000 developer accounts due to suspected fraudulent activities.
- The scammers also used heinous tactics to force the loanees to pay. According to reports, the scammers behind the apps gained access to the user’s contact list as well as their images. They would morph the images and then scare the individual by sharing their fake nude photos with their whole contact list.
Dangerous financial fraud apps have surfaced on the App Store
- TechCrunch acquired a user review from one of these apps. “I borrowed an amount in a helpless situation, and a day before the repayment due date, I got some messages with my picture and my contacts in my phone saying that repay your loan or they will inform our contacts that you are not paying the loan,” it said.
- Sandhya Ramesh, a journalist from The Print, recently tweeted a screenshot of a direct message she got. A victim’s friend told a similar story in the message.
- TechCrunch contacted Apple, who confirmed that the apps had been removed from the App Store for breaking the Apple Developer Program License Agreement and guidelines.
Conclusion
Recently, some users have claimed that some quick-loan applications, such as White Kash, Pocket Kash, and Golden Kash, have appeared on the Top Finance applications chart in recent days. These apps necessitate unauthorised and intrusive access to users’ contact lists and media. According to hundreds of user evaluations, these apps charged exorbitantly high and useless fees. They used unscrupulous techniques such as demanding “processing fees” equal to half the loan amount and charging high-interest rates. Users were also harassed and threatened with restitution. If payments were not made by the due date, the lending applications threatened to notify users’ contacts. According to one user, the app provider even threatened to generate phoney nude images of her and send them to her contacts.
