#FactCheck - Manipulated Image Alleging Disrespect Towards PM Circulates Online

Introduction

‍

The way we interact, go about our daily lives and manage our financial resources has completely changed in this digital age. Tasks that were earlier done manually (and were extremely time-consuming) now happen in just minutes and seconds. As this convenience expands, so do the risks that come with it. The proliferation of digital technology has opened up a wide arena where we, as users, are getting exposed to a complex environment of emerging cyber threats at every step. This has become especially true for our senior citizens, who face heightened vulnerabilities owing to their age and situational factors. Therefore, getting an understanding of these risks and knowing how to respond to them is no longer optional.

‍

Cybercrime against senior citizens is rising every year. The elderly today are using and depending on smartphones, net banking, UPI (Unified Payments Interface) and social media more than ever. Scammers are preying on this circumstance and perpetrating well-planned cyber attacks on the senior population. A 2024 report from the United States Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that analysed cybercrime data for the year 2023 found that older adults lost more money per incident as opposed to the younger population. 

‍

This blog aims at providing practical and easy-to-follow cyber safety tips for senior citizens and a clear action plan on how to respond if they ever fall victim to a scam.

‍

Safe and Smart Browsing for the Elderly: Essential Cybersecurity Tips

‍

1. Device safety: Cybersecurity can be ensured with one simple rule, which is securing your device first. This is the first line of defence against cybercrime and can go a long way in preventing online attacks and scams. This device security can be established by using screen locks such as setting up a PIN, lock patterns, fingerprints, or even applying the face lock feature on smartphones and tablets. 

‍

The next step is to install a reputable antivirus on your device (such as laptops and desktops) and keep updating it from time to time. Enabling additional security features in your devices, such as ‘automatic updates’, further ensures that the phone’s Operating System (OS) and the Applications (apps) remain up to date. This guarantees that the device’s OS and the apps are fully upgraded to catch and fix any new security threats. Users should also beware of any unauthorised software. Suspicious links or messages that offer free software or updates should be avoided at all costs. 

‍

The Government of India’s 2024 cyber safety booklet also stresses the importance of keeping devices and apps equipped with the latest security patches to prevent exploitation of any known vulnerabilities. 

‍

2. Robust Passwords and 2FA: Weak passwords are one of the easiest entry points for cybercriminals. This is why it is crucial to have strong and robust passwords to keep accounts and devices absolutely secure. It is also important to make sure to avoid using very basic PINs, such as date of birth or predictable ascending digits such as ‘12345’. Also, similar passwords should not be used across various bank, email or social media accounts. While creating a strong password, ideally, one should use a combination of upper case and lower case letters along with mixed digits and special characters. If need be, one can jot down these complex passwords in a separate physical diary to keep a record and refer to it in case of forgetfulness. 

‍

Enabling two-factor authentication adds an extra layer of protection. Whenever and wherever possible, users should enable OTP (one-time password) based verification or app-based authentication codes. In case someone does end up stealing the user’s password, they would still need the second factor to log in.

‍

The Government of India supported the Information Security Education and Awareness (ISEA) initiative, which also provides guidelines that recommend the use of passwords and secure authentication as key cyber safety practices for senior citizens.

‍

3. Handle messages with caution: Most cybercrime instances against senior citizens are initiated with a phone call, an SMS or a WhatsApp message. Personal details such as OTPs, CVV (3-digit number on the back of a debit/credit card), ATM or UPI PIN, full debit/credit card number, net banking ID and password, etc., should never be shared over a call or a chat. Also, people need to be aware of the fact that genuine officials will never make any demands for such details over calls or messages. ISEA has specifically warned about frauds like phishing, where fraudsters call or message their victims pretending to be from banks, courier companies, telecom operators or from the government to trick seniors into revealing their personal details.

‍

A caller might say ‘Your KYC can get blocked, give OTP now’ or ‘Your card will get deactivated, click this link’. Hang up immediately! Do not click any links, do not share any number and do not install any app that they suggest (eg. remote access apps).

‍

4. Banking without worries: Online banking is truly a boon, especially for senior citizens. It eliminates the need to visit the bank in person for every small requirement. But this comfort and ease can serve us well only if we use it with a certain sense of vigilance and responsibility. 

‍

Users are advised to use only official banking apps that are downloaded from Google Play Store or the Apple App Store. It is also prudent to activate SMS or email alerts for all online transactions so that the user receives timely notifications of any withdrawal or transfer. Users should also avoid using public Wi-Fi connections for banking or UPI payments. It is better  to use your own mobile data or a home Wi-Fi with a strong password. This safeguards your financial transactions. India has a system in place called the Citizen Financial Cyber Fraud Reporting and Management System (CFCFRMS) that quickly responds to online financial fraud, especially with regards to UPI and net banking frauds.

‍

5. Think before you share: Beyond online banking and other essential activities on the web, lies the world of social media which has seamlessly woven itself into our daily routines. Therefore, gaining awareness about the safe usage of social media is extremely important. For starters, users should keep the privacy settings of their social media accounts as ‘Private’. They should also be mindful of accepting friend requests from strangers or unknown profiles, even if they claim that they know the user. Users must also avoid ‘oversharing’ on public platforms and social media accounts. It is always best to refrain from posting about personal details on social media such as finances, travel schedules or addresses. If a user receives urgent messages from a close friend or a relative asking for money, then it is better to first call them up directly to verify that the request is genuine. 

‍

The older generation should also be wary of fraudsters who, under false identities, build emotional relationships online and then start demanding money, gifts or even private photos from their victims. 

‍

6. Stay a step ahead: Lastly, senior users can stay a step ahead in this game by familiarising themselves with the typical scams that are targeted towards their age group. This know-how will prepare them to identify scam patterns and early warning signs. Discussing experiences or sharing knowledge with family members or peers can also help seniors bridge the gap between awareness and action.

Fallen for a scam? Don’t panic! Here’s what seniors should do next: An action plan for recovery and protection

‍

We are all human at the end of the day. Anyone can fall for a scam, even the most careful people. The important thing is how to ‘respond’ after getting scammed. As per the 2023 Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) Elder Fraud Report, prompt reporting after a scam can improve the chances of either freezing or retrieving the stolen money. If you have fallen for a scam, here is what you should do:

‍

1. Keep calm and disconnect: Though it may feel challenging, but the first instinct that victims should display is to keep their calm and hang up the phone. The victim should then block the number and refrain from responding to any further emails or messages. Any remote access app, screen sharing app or a support tool that were installed at the request of the caller, should be instantly uninstalled.

‍

2. Alert your bank right away: Time is of the essence when it comes to online financial frauds. If a user has been scammed and he is aware of it, then he should immediately call the official customer care number of his bank. It is to be noted here that this number should be verified from the bank’s website or from the user’s credit/debit card. Once the user is connected to the bank’s support staff, he should inform them clearly that he has been a victim of an online fraud. The support staff may guide the user regarding the options that he can undertake. These can be: blocking the cards, freezing the account or an attempt from the bank’s interface to try and stop or recall the recent transaction. 

‍

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has laid down certain guidelines on unauthorised electronic banking transactions that encourage quick reporting and provide a steady framework for customer liability. Also, if in case a victim feels that the bank’s response has been unsatisfactory, the complaints can be further escalated to the RBI Ombudsman.

‍

3. Reset online credentials: Once the victim has spoken to the bank and taken all necessary steps in that regard, the next step is to reset the passwords. Passwords for netbanking, UPI apps, email accounts, social media, shopping platforms, etc., should all be changed. The victim can also turn on two factor authentication for all important accounts. Incase some critical information like PAN (Permanent Account Number) or Aadhar or SSN (Social Security Number ) has been shared, the victim should be on the lookout for any identity theft in the form of unknown loans, new cards or credit enquiries. 

‍

4. Notify official cybercrime portals or authorities: The next step is to inform the relevant cybercrime authorities in your region. In India there is a government backed National Cyber Crime Helpline which is a part of the Financial Cyber Fraud Reporting and Management System. The aim of the helpline is to prevent further losses in digital payment frauds. Victims can also file a complaint on the National Cyber Crime Reporting portal. Other than these options, the victim can visit the nearest police station along with copies of their online complaint, bank statements, transaction receipts and ID proofs. 

‍

In the US, such complaints can be lodged with the IC3 which runs a specialised elder fraud program. The IC3 also publishes the annual Elder Fraud Report and lays down latest guidelines and trends regarding cybercrime.

‍

5. Preserve proofs of the scam: The IC3’s 2023 report notes that detailed and prompt reporting by the victim enables law enforcement and financial institutions to deploy ‘Financial Fraud Kill Chain’ procedures that help in tracing or freezing stolen funds. This is why it is very important to preserve the evidence of a cyber scam. Proper documentation can help banks and law enforcement agencies to properly investigate a case. If possible, the victim should save all messages, WhatsApp chats, emails, screenshots and voice recordings. Establishing a clear timeline of the events also helps. Minute details such as: when the first call was received, what was said and when the money exited the victim’s account, significantly help in piecing together the full picture. Victims should also keep a record of all bank statements and transaction alert messages related to the fraudulent activity. 

‍

6. Helping seniors heal: Apart from monetary damage, the emotional impact of a scam should also be acknowledged. Getting scammed can be deeply humiliating for senior citizens, especially at their age where everyday life may already feel quite overwhelming. Also, when it comes to their lifelong savings, the ramifications of becoming a victim of an online financial scam can be quite distressing for seniors. The US Department of Justice’s elder fraud content emphasises on the fact that senior victims need ample emotional support and should not be blamed or shamed for their predicament.

‍

Families and caregivers can guide the elderly victims step by step through the recovery process which includes taking the necessary technical steps, filling out forms and following up with banks or authorities. For large value frauds, repeated targeting or cases that involve identity theft, getting a legal consult for the victim is highly advisable. This kind of support and reassurance can help seniors reduce their anxiety and regain their inner strength.

‍

Secure today, safe tomorrow

‍

The rate of cybercrime against senior citizens isn’t showing any signs of slowing down. Scammers are refining their techniques every day. Therefore, the best long standing defence against cybercrime is to make cyber safety a regular habit. This can be achieved with the support of families, caregivers and communities. Beyond the practical steps, spreading awareness and maintaining an open dialogue is equally important. Senior citizens should feel comfortable asking questions, sharing concerns and continue learning from experiences, be it theirs or of others. Reinforcement of safe online practices should become ingrained at the core of every society. When cybersecurity practices merge with everyday life, seniors gain both protection and confidence. Simple and steady digital safety practices that come with guidance and reassurance empower the seniors to enjoy the benefits of technology without fear.

Simply put, the habits that are adopted today will lay the foundation for a secure and safer digital tomorrow.

‍

References  

• https://bankingjournal.aba.com/2024/11/ftc-older-adults-lost-up-to-61-5b-to-fraud-in-2023/
• https://www.cert-in.org.in/PDF/CSH_Booklet.pdf
• https://infosecawareness.in/concept/cyber-security-tips-for-senior-citizens
• https://cybercrime.gov.in/UploadMedia/instructions_citizenreportingcyberfrauds.pdf
• https://www.ic3.gov/annualreport/reports/2023_ic3elderfraudreport.pdf
• https://www.arklegal.in/post/how-to-report-cyber-crime-in-india
• https://www.pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1814120
• https://cybercrime.gov.in/Webform/crmcondi.aspx
• https://www.justice.gov/archives/stopfraud-archive/elder-fraud-and-financial-exploitation
• https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/federal-trade-commission-protecting-older-adults-report_102024.pdf
• https://www.unionbankofindia.bank.in/pdf/cyber-security-customer-awareness-guide-vol-v.pdf
• https://cdnbbsr.s3waas.gov.in/s371e09b16e21f7b6919bbfc43f6a5b2f0/uploads/2024/11/20241111752149945.pdf
• https://www.dsci.in/files/content/documents/2024/CSAM24-Infographic_Cyber-Safety-Essentials-for-Senior-Citizens-v1.pdf

‍

Introduction
‍

The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) tools and applications in companies has been largely presented as a groundbreaking development for enterprises. The potential for increased productivity and efficiently scaled companies eliminates repetitive tasks and builds a narrative that practically writes itself for executives. What has largely been ignored, however, is its effect on its users- the employees.  Evidence from across the United States, United Kingdom, and continental Europe indicates an increase in psychological disengagement from work, along with an increase in the number of people who are actively sabotaging the very systems that companies have invested millions of dollars to implement, as a direct result of being forced to work with AI. 

‍

The Backdrop: Quiet Quitting
‍

Quiet quitting is a form of employee disengagement  wherein workers meet only the basic expectations of their job without. Gallup puts global employee engagement at just 21%. State of the Global Workplace 2026 report which analysed employee well-being across 160 countries reports that in India,  employee and manager engagement has declined. Around 62% of workers describe themselves as not engaged, and another 17% are actively disengaged — not just drifting, but potentially pulling in the opposite direction. What does this mean for productivity? Gallup estimates this costs the global economy roughly $8.9 trillion in lost productivity each year, around 9% of world GDP. This is the workplace AI has entered into. 

‍

How AI Is Changing the Nature of Work

‍

The promise was simpler work but employees report that the reality is often more of it. AI raises output expectations without necessarily reducing effort. Workers now lose the equivalent of 51 working days per year to technology friction, nearly two full months up 42% from 2025. Poorly integrated systems force employees to spend hours troubleshooting or correcting AI-generated outputs, adding cognitive load rather than removing it. Focus efficiency dropped to a three-year low of 60%, as collaboration time surged 34% and multitasking climbed 12%. AI is not eliminating work. It is transforming it into something more demanding and more fragmented. The psychological dimension is equally documented. TalentLMS research found that 54% of employees report persistent workplace unhappiness, with one in five experiencing it frequently or constantly. 29% report unmanageable workloads during this transition, and 15% do not clearly understand their role expectations in an AI-transformed workplace. When workers cannot see where they fit, withdrawal is a rational response.

Then there is the fear. IBM announced it would not replace roughly 7,800 back-office positions that could be handled by AI, framing it as natural attrition. Klarna said its AI assistant was doing the work of 700 full-time customer service agents. Dropbox laid off 16% of its workforce, with its CEO explicitly citing the need to “make room for AI.” AI was the leading cause of job cuts in March 2026  the first time that has happened since tracking began. 

‍

The Causal Link: AI Anxiety to Quiet Quitting
‍

A peer-reviewed study published in March 2025 establishes the causal mechanism between forced AI adoption and employee disengagement. Conducted across 457 employees in Turkish SMEs, it found that AI anxiety does not directly compel people to resign. Instead, it triggers quiet quitting a form of progressive disengagement that functions as a precursor to departure. Drawing on Withdrawal Progression Theory, the study frames quiet quitting as a preliminary stage of turnover intention, where withdrawal progresses from mild detachment toward eventual exit. The integrated causal chain runs as follows: forced AI adoption creates work intensification and job anxiety, which produce burnout and loss of autonomy, which trigger psychological withdrawal, which precedes turnover. DHR Global’s Workforce Trends Report for 2026 found that overall employee engagement dropped from 88% to 64% in a single year. Crucially, 69% of C-suite leaders say their company has communicated clearly about AI’s impact on jobs but only 12% of entry-level staff agree. When the people most exposed to displacement are also the least informed about what is happening to their roles, disengagement is not a mystery. It is a response to a vacuum of information.

‍

From Disengagement to Active Withdrawal
‍

Quiet quitting is then a natural response. But what has emerged alongside it is something more active, and it is where the disengagement crisis tips into something organisations are unprepared for. The Writer and Workplace Intelligence survey of 2,400 knowledge workers found that 29% of employees admit to willfully withdrawing from their company’s AI strategy. Among Gen Z workers, that figure jumps to 44%. Active withdrawal takes several forms: entering proprietary data into public AI chatbots, using unapproved tools, outright refusing to engage with mandated platforms, and in some cases deliberately generating low-quality outputs to make the technology look ineffective. For Gen Z, the resistance has a structural logic. Junior roles in finance, law, and tech the traditional “learning by doing” rungs of the career ladder have declined by 32% since 2022. For a 22-year-old, AI is not a tool; it is a competitor that has already taken their first job. Workers who resist AI out of fear for their jobs are making themselves more vulnerable to the outcome they dread. 77% of executives say employees who refuse to become proficient in AI will not be considered for promotions or leadership roles, and 60% are considering cutting those who refuse to adopt it entirely.

Meanwhile, 75% of executives admit their company’s AI strategy is “more for show” than a meaningful guide to outcomes. Only 29% report significant ROI from generative AI, despite 97% claiming to have already deployed agents across their organisation. 39% of business leaders admit they made employees redundant as a result of deploying AI of whom 55% concede they made the wrong decisions about those redundancies. Organisations are moving fast, getting it wrong, and the cost is being absorbed by the workforce.

‍

Conclusion
‍

AI is not directly causing quiet quitting. However, AI is changing how we view working relationships; it will continue to result in predictable outcomes of poor execution of AI (i.e. passive to active disengagement) and radically change the way that we work, primarily by creating an increase in job demands, reducing autonomy, and  raising worker anxiety without providing any transparency about future AI technology use.  If AI continues to create a challenging work environment, it may lead to increased psychological detachment from work and ultimately result in productivity losses, possibly canceling out the very gains expected from AI integration. This globally rising disengagement from AI tools begets the question: is technology being deployed responsibly? 

‍

References 
‍

1. https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx 
2. https://www.walkme.com/news-releases/enterprises-lose-51-workdays-per-employee-to-technology-friction-annually-despite-record-ai-investment-walkme-global-study-of-3750-finds/.  
3. https://www.activtrak.com/resources/state-of-the-workplace/ 
4. https://peoplemanagingpeople.com/employee-retention/quiet-cracking/ 
5. https://www.webpronews.com/the-quiet-revolt-gen-z-workers-are-deliberately-undermining-ai-deployments-from-the-inside/ 
6. https://www.uctoday.com/productivity-automation/44-of-gen-z-workers-are-sabotaging-your-enterprise-ai-rollout-the-problem-isnt-gen-z/ 
7. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11939379/ 
8. https://huntscanlon.com/workforce-trends-2026-leaders-confront-burnout-disengagement-and-ai-driven-change/ 
9. https://fortune.com/2026/04/08/gen-z-workers-sabotage-ai-rollout-backlash/  
10. https://peoplemanagingpeople.com/employee-retention/quiet-cracking/
11. https://www.hrgrapevine.com/us/content/article/2026-04-09-ai-adoption-is-tearing-companies-apart-says-new-report 
12. https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/new-updates/india-leads-in-workplace-disengagement-as-quiet-quitting-trend-rises-why-are-indians-mentally-checking-out-at-jobs/articleshow/130104773.cms?from=mdr 

‍

Introduction

The unprecedented rise of social media, challenges with regional languages, and the heavy use of messaging apps like WhatsApp have all led to an increase in misinformation in India. False stories spread quickly and can cause significant harm, like political propaganda and health-related mis/misinformation. Programs that teach people how to use social media responsibly and attempt to check facts are essential, but they do not always connect with people deeply. Reading stories, attending lectures, and using tools that check facts are standard passive learning methods used in traditional media literacy programs. 

Adding game-like features to non-game settings is called "gamification," it could be a new and interesting way to answer this question. Gamification involves engaging people by making them active players instead of just passive consumers of information. Research shows that interactive learning improves interest, thinking skills, and memory. People can learn to recognise fake news safely by turning fact-checking into a game before encountering it in real life. A study by Roozenbeek and van der Linden (2019) showed that playing misinformation games can significantly enhance people's capacity to recognise and avoid false information.

Several misinformation-related games have been successfully implemented worldwide:

• The Bad News Game – This browser-based game by Cambridge University lets players step into the shoes of a fake news creator, teaching them how misinformation is crafted and spread (Roozenbeek & van der Linden, 2019).
• Factitious – A quiz game where users swipe left or right to decide whether a news headline is real or fake (Guess et al., 2020).
• Go Viral! – A game designed to inoculate people against COVID-19 misinformation by simulating the tactics used by fake news peddlers (van der Linden et al., 2020).

For programs to effectively combat misinformation in India, they must consider factors such as the responsible use of smartphones, evolving language trends, and common misinformation patterns in the country. Here are some key aspects to keep in mind:

1. Vernacular Languages

There should be games in Hindi, Tamil, Bengali, Telugu, and other major languages since that is how rumours spread in different areas and diverse cultural contexts. AI voice conversation and translation can help reduce literacy differences. Research shows that people are more likely to engage with and trust information in their native language (Pennycook & Rand, 2019).

2. Games Based on WhatsApp

Interactive tests and chatbot-powered games can educate consumers directly within the app they use most frequently since WhatsApp is a significant hub for false information. A game with a WhatsApp-like interface where players may feel like they are in real life, having to decide whether to avoid, check the facts of, or forward messages that are going viral could be helpful in India.

3. Detecting False Information

As part of a mobile-friendly game, players can pretend to be reporters or fact-checkers and have to prove stories that are going viral. They can do the same with real-life tools like reverse picture searches or reliable websites that check facts. Research shows that doing interactive tasks to find fake news makes people more aware of it over time (Lewandowsky et al., 2017).

4. Reward-Based Participation

Participation could be increased by providing rewards for finishing misleading challenges, such as badges, diplomas, or even incentives on mobile data. This might be easier to do if there are relationships with phone companies. Reward-based learning has made people more interested and motivated in digital literacy classes (Deterding et al., 2011).

5. Universities and Schools 

Educational institutions can help people spot false information by adding game-like elements to their lessons. Hamari et al. (2014) say that students are more likely to join and remember what they learn when there are competitive and interactive parts to the learning. Misinformation games can be used in media studies classes at schools and universities by using models to teach students how to check sources, spot bias, and understand the psychological tricks that misinformation campaigns use.

What Artificial Intelligence Can Do for Gamification

Artificial intelligence can tailor learning experiences to each player in false games. AI-powered misinformation detection bots could lead participants through situations tailored to their learning level, ensuring they are consistently challenged. Recent natural language processing (NLP) developments enable AI to identify nuanced misinformation patterns and adjust gameplay accordingly (Zellers et al., 2019). This could be especially helpful in India, where fake news is spread differently depending on the language and area.

Possible Opportunities

Augmented reality (AR) scavenger hunts for misinformation, interactive misinformation events, and educational misinformation tournaments are all examples of games that help fight misinformation. India can help millions, especially young people, think critically and combat the spread of false information by making media literacy fun and interesting. Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) in gamified treatments for misinformation could be a fascinating area of study in the future. AI-powered bots could mimic real-time cases of misinformation and give quick feedback, which would help students learn more.

Problems and Moral Consequences

While gaming is an interesting way to fight false information, it also comes with some problems that you should think about:

• Ethical Concerns: Games that try to imitate how fake news spreads must ensure players do not learn how to spread false information by accident.
• Scalability: Although worldwide misinformation initiatives exist, developing and expanding localised versions for India's varied language and cultural contexts provide significant challenges.
• Assessing Impact: There is a necessity for rigorous research approaches to evaluate the efficacy of gamified treatments in altering misinformation-related behaviours, keeping cultural and socio-economic contexts in the picture.

Conclusion 

A gamified approach can serve as an effective tool in India's fight against misinformation. By integrating game elements into digital literacy programs, it can encourage critical thinking and help people recognize misinformation more effectively. The goal is to scale these efforts, collaborate with educators, and leverage India's rapidly evolving technology to make fact-checking a regular practice rather than an occasional concern.

As technology and misinformation evolve, so must the strategies to counter them. A coordinated and multifaceted approach, one that involves active participation from netizens, strict platform guidelines, fact-checking initiatives, and support from expert organizations that proactively prebunk and debunk misinformation can be a strong way forward.

References

• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining "gamification". Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference.
• Guess, A., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2020). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances.
• Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?—A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Proceedings of the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
• Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Fighting misinformation on social media using “accuracy prompts”. Nature Human Behaviour.
• Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019). The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research.
• van der Linden, S., Roozenbeek, J., Compton, J. (2020). Inoculating against fake news about COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology.
• Zellers, R., Holtzman, A., Rashkin, H., Bisk, Y., Farhadi, A., Roesner, F., & Choi, Y. (2019). Defending against neural fake news. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.

‍