#Factcheck-Viral Image of Men Riding an Elephant Next to a Tiger in Bihar is Misleading

Executive Summary:

‍
A widely circulated claim on social media indicates that six soldiers of the Assam Rifles were killed during a retaliatory attack carried out by a Myanmar-based breakaway faction of the United Liberation Front of Asom (Independent), or ULFA (I). The post included a photograph of coffins covered in Indian flags with reference to soldiers who were part of the incident where ULFA (I) killed six soldiers. The post was widely shared, however, the fact-check confirms that the photograph is old, not related, and there are no trustworthy reports to indicate that any such incident took place. This claim is therefore false and misleading.

‍

‍

Claim:

‍
Social media users claimed that the banned militant outfit ULFA (I) killed six Assam Rifles personnel in retaliation for an alleged drone and missile strike by Indian forces on their camp in Myanmar with captions on it “Six Indian Army Assam Rifles soldiers have reportedly been killed in a retaliatory attack by the Myanmar-based ULFA group.”. The claim was accompanied by a viral post showing coffins of Indian soldiers, which added emotional weight and perceived authenticity to the narrative. 

‍

‍

Fact Check:

‍
We began our research with a reverse image search of the image of coffins in Indian flags, which we saw was shared with the viral claim. We found the image can be traced to August 2013. We found the traces in  The Washington Post,  which confirms the fact that the viral snap is from the Past incident where five Indian Army soldiers were killed by Pakistani intruders in Poonch, Jammu, and Kashmir, on August 6, 2013. 

‍

‍

Also, The Hindu and India Today offered no confirmation of the death of six Assam Rifles personnel. However, ULFA (I) did issue a statement dated July 13, 2025, claiming that three of its leaders had been killed in a drone strike by Indian forces. 

‍

‍

However, by using Shutterstock, it depicts that the coffin's image is old and not representative of any current actions by the United Liberation Front of Asom (ULFA).

‍

‍

The Indian Army denied it, with Defence PRO Lt Col Mahendra Rawat telling reporters there were "no inputs" of such an operation. Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma also rejected that there was cross-border military action whatsoever. Therefore, the viral claim is false and misleading.

‍

‍

Conclusion:

‍
The assertion that ULFA (I) killed six soldiers from the 6th Assam Rifles in a retaliation strike is incorrect. The viral image used in these posts is from 2013 in Jammu & Kashmir and has no relevance to the present. There have been no verified reports of any such killings, and both the Indian Army and the Assam government have categorically denied having conducted or knowing of any cross-border operation. This faulty narrative is circulating, and it looks like it is only inciting fear and misinformation therefore, please ignore it.

• Claim: Report confirms the death of six Assam Rifles personnel in an ULFA-led attack.
• Claimed On: Social Media
• Fact Check: False and Misleading

‍

Introduction

The rapid advancement of technology, including generative AI, offers immense benefits but also raises concerns about misuse. The Internet Watch Foundation reported that, as of July 2024, over 3,500 new AI-generated child sexual abuse images appeared on the dark web. The UK’s National Crime Agency records 800 monthly arrests for online child threats and estimates 840,000 adults as potential offenders. In response, the UK is introducing legislation to criminalise AI-generated child exploitation imagery, which will be a part of the Crime and Policing Bill when it comes to parliament in the next few weeks, aligning with global AI regulations like the EU AI Act and the US AI Initiative Act. This policy shift strengthens efforts to combat online child exploitation and sets a global precedent for responsible AI governance.

Current Legal Landscape and the Policy Gap 

The UK’s Online Safety Act 2023 aims to combat CSAM and deepfake pornography by holding social media and search platforms accountable for user safety. It mandates these platforms to prevent children from accessing harmful content, remove illegal material, and offer clear reporting mechanisms. For adults, major platforms must be transparent about harmful content policies and provide users control over what they see.

However, the Act has notable limitations, including concerns over content moderation overreach, potential censorship of legitimate debates, and challenges in defining "harmful" content. It may disproportionately impact smaller platforms and raise concerns about protecting journalistic content and politically significant discussions. While intended to enhance online safety, these challenges highlight the complexities of balancing regulation with digital rights and free expression. 

The Proposed Criminalisation of AI-Generated Sexual Abuse Content

The proposed law by the UK criminalises the creation, distribution, and possession of AI-generated CSAM and deepfake pornography. It mandates enforcement agencies and digital platforms to identify and remove such content, with penalties for non-compliance. Perpetrators may face up to two years in prison for taking intimate images without consent or installing equipment to facilitate such offences. Currently, sharing or threatening to share intimate images, including deepfakes, is an offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003, amended by the Online Safety Act 2023. The government plans to repeal certain voyeurism offences, replacing them with broader provisions covering unauthorised intimate recordings. This aligns with its September 2024 decision to classify sharing intimate images as a priority offence under the Online Safety Act, reinforcing its commitment to balancing free expression with harm prevention.

Implications for AI Regulation and Platform Responsibility

The UK's move aligns with its AI Safety Summit commitments, placing responsibility on platforms to remove AI-generated sexual abuse content or face Ofcom enforcement. The Crime and Policing Bill is expected to tighten AI regulations, requiring developers to integrate safeguards against misuse, and the licensing frameworks may enforce ethical AI standards, restricting access to synthetic media tools. Given AI-generated abuse's cross-border nature, enforcement will necessitate global cooperation with platforms, law enforcement, and regulators. Bilateral and multilateral agreements could help harmonise legal frameworks, enabling swift content takedown, evidence sharing, and extradition of offenders, strengthening international efforts against AI-enabled exploitation.

Conclusion and Policy Recommendations 

The Crime and Policing Bill marks a crucial step in criminalising AI-generated CSAM and deepfake pornography, strengthening online safety and platform accountability. However, balancing digital rights and enforcement remains a challenge. For effective implementation, industry cooperation is essential, with platforms integrating detection tools and transparent reporting systems. AI ethics frameworks should prevent misuse while allowing innovation, and victim support mechanisms must be prioritised. Given AI-driven abuse's global nature, international regulatory alignment is key for harmonised laws, evidence sharing, and cross-border enforcement. This legislation sets a global precedent, emphasising proactive regulation to ensure digital safety, ethical AI development, and the protection of human dignity.

References

• https://www.iwf.org.uk/about-us/why-we-exist/our-research/how-ai-is-being-abused-to-create-child-sexual-abuse-imagery/
• https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/uk-makes-use-ai-tools-create-child-abuse-material-crime-2025-02-01/
• https://www.financialexpress.com/life/technology-uk-set-to-ban-ai-tools-for-creating-child-sexual-abuse-images-with-new-laws-3735296/
• https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-crime-agency-annual-report-and-accounts-2023-to-2024/national-crime-agency-annual-report-and-accounts-2023-to-2024-accessible#part-1--performance-report

‍

A video of Bollywood actor and Kolkata Knight Riders (KKR) owner Shah Rukh Khan is going viral on social media. The video claims that Shah Rukh Khan is reacting to opposition against Bangladeshi bowler Mustafizur Rahman playing for KKR and is allegedly calling industrialist Gautam Adani a “traitor,” while appealing to stop Hindu–Muslim politics.

‍

Research by the CyberPeace Foundation found that the voice heard in the video is not Shah Rukh Khan’s but is AI-generated. Shah Rukh Khan has not made any official statement regarding Mustafizur Rahman’s removal from KKR. The claim made in the video concerning industrialist Gautam Adani is also completely misleading and baseless.

‍

Claim

‍

In the viral video, Shah Rukh Khan is allegedly heard saying: “People barking about Mustafizur Rahman playing for KKR should stop it. Adani is earning money by betraying the country by supplying electricity from India to Bangladesh. Leave Hindu–Muslim politics and raise your voice against traitors like Adani for the welfare of the country. Mustafizur Rahman will continue to play for the team.”

‍

The post link, archive link, and screenshots can be seen below:

‍

• Archive link: https://archive.is/XsQXp
• Facebook reel link: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1220246633365097

‍

‍

‍

‍

Research

‍

We examined the key frames of Shah Rukh Khan’s viral video using Google Lens. During this process, we found the original video on the official YouTube channel Talks at Google, which was uploaded on 2 October 2014.

‍

In this video, Shah Rukh Khan is seen wearing the same outfit as in the viral clip. He is seen responding to questions from Google CEO Sundar Pichai. The YouTube video description mentions that Shah Rukh Khan participated in a fireside chat held at the Googleplex, where he answered Pichai’s questions and also promoted his upcoming film “Happy New Year.”

‍

The link to the video is given : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_8UBv5bZo0

‍

‍

Upon closely analyzing the viral video of Shah Rukh Khan, we noticed a clear mismatch between his voice and lip movements (lip sync). Such inconsistencies usually appear when the original video or its audio has been tampered with.

‍

We then examined the audio present in the video using the AI detection tool Aurigin. According to the tool’s results, the audio in the viral video was found to be approximately 99 percent AI-generated.

‍

Conclusion

‍

Our research confirmed that the voice heard in the video is not Shah Rukh Khan’s but is AI-generated. Shah Rukh Khan has not made any official comment regarding Mustafizur Rahman’s removal from KKR. Additionally, the claims made in the video about industrialist Gautam Adani are completely misleading and baseless.

‍