#FactCheck - Edited Video of ‘India-India’ Chants at Republican National Convention

Executive Summary

‍

An image of a banknote featuring Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Khamenei is going viral on social media, with claims that Iran’s central bank has issued a newly designed 5 million rial note bearing his portrait. However, a fact-check by the CyberPeace Research Wing  has found the claim to be misleading.

‍

Claim
‍

The image was shared by a verified user, “Sprinter Press Agency,” on X (formerly Twitter), claiming that the Central Bank had introduced a new banknote design featuring the leader of the Islamic Revolution.

• https://x.com/ImHuMeer786H/status/2048042719231291661

‍

‍

Fact Check

‍

To verify the claim, relevant keywords were searched across multiple credible sources. No reports were found from any reputable international media outlet, Iranian government platform, or the Central Bank of Iran confirming the release of such a banknote. A technical analysis of the viral image was also conducted. According to the AI detection tool Zhuque AI Detection Assistant, there is a 63.8% probability that the image is AI-generated, raising further doubts about its authenticity.

‍

‍

Conclusion:
‍

The claim that Iran’s central bank has issued a new 5 million rial banknote featuring Ayatollah Khamenei is misleading. There is no official confirmation of such a release, and available evidence suggests that the viral image is either edited or AI-generated.

‍

The Equitable Growth Approach of AI and Digital Twins

Digital Twins can be simply described as virtual replicas of physical assets or systems, powered by real-time data and advanced simulations. When this technology is combined with AI, the impact it has on enabling real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, optimised operations, and improved design processes through the creation of virtual replicas of physical assets becomes even greater.  The greatest value of AI is its ability to make data actionable. And when combined with digital twins, these data can be collated, analysed, inefficiencies removed, and better decisions can be taken to improve efficiency and quality. 

This intersection between AI and Digital Twins holds immense potential for addressing key challenges, particularly in countries like India, which is rapidly embracing digital adoption to achieve its economic ambitions and sustainability goals. According to Salesforce’s most recent survey on generative AI use among the general population within the U.S., UK, Australia and India, 75% of generative AI users are looking to automate repetitive tasks and use generative AI for work communications. India is particularly looking towards a rapid digital adoption, economic ambitions, and sustainable developments to be achieved through AI adoption. This blog discuss the intersection of equitable growth, sustainability, and AI-driven policies in India.

Sustainability and the Path Ahead: Digital Twin and AI-Driven Solutions 

India faces sustainability challenges which are mainly associated with issues such as urban congestion, the rising demand for energy along with climate change and environmental degradation. AI and Digital Twins provide solutions for real-time simulations and predictive analysis. Some of the examples are its applications in sustainable urban planning such as smart cities like the Indore Smart City Initiative and traffic optimisation, energy efficiency/optimisation through AI-driven renewable energy projects and power grid optimisation and even water resource management through leak detection, equitable distribution and conservation.

The need is to balance innovation with regulation, particularly, underscoring the importance of ethical and sustainable deployment of AI and digital twins and addressing data privacy with AI ethics with recent developments such as the India’s evolving AI policy landscape, including the National Strategy for Artificial Intelligence and its focus on AI for All, regulatory frameworks such as  DPDP Act and the manner in which they address AI ethics, data privacy, and digital governance.

The need is to initiate targeted policies that promote research and development in AI and digital twin technologies, skill development and partnerships with the private sector, think tanks, nonprofits and others. Also, collaborations at the global level would include aligning our domestic policies with global AI and sustainability initiatives and leveraging the international frameworks for climate tech and smart infrastructure. 

Cyberpeace Outlook

As part of specific actions, policymakers need to engage in proactive governance to ensure the responsible use and development of AI. This includes enacting incentive schemes for sustainable AI projects and strengthening the enforcement of data privacy laws. Industry leaders must support equitable access to AI and digital twin technologies and develop tailored AI tools for resource-constrained settings, particularly in India. Finally, researchers need to drive innovation in alignment with sustainability goals, such as those related to agriculture and groundwater management.

References

• https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/artificial-intelligence/technologies-like-ai-and-digital-twins-can-tackle-challenges-like-equitable-growth-to-sustainability-wef/articleshow/117121897.cms 
• https://www.salesforce.com/news/stories/generative-ai-statistics/
• https://www.mdpi.com/2673-2688/4/3/38 ‍
• https://www.ibm.com/think/topics/generative-ai-for-digital-twin-energy-utilities

Introduction

‍

‍"Artificial Intelligence may be the new charlatan in town"

‍

There is something almost wonderfully Indian about our current relationship with artificial intelligence. We are simultaneously afraid of it, fascinated by it, regulating it, funding it, using it and occasionally asking it to write the regulation meant to control it. In contrast, artificial intelligence seems to have figured out the oldest trick in the book: create an issue and then figure out how to solve it. Both the deepfake and the deepfake detector can be produced by it. It has the ability to  both generate and detect false information. It can both authenticate and mimic your voice. It can create a fake image and determine if it is fake. The machine ,in other words, is increasingly becoming both the burglar and the security system. We now refer to this as innovation.  Perhaps nothing better captures this peculiar moment than India’s most recent regulatory actions. The government has strengthened regulations pertaining to synthetic content such as requiring labelling and expediting the removal of illegal AI-generated information. After a legitimate government or court order, platforms are expected to take action within three hours, significantly reducing the removal window for some content. It took years for the internet to become ubiquitous. There are  now three hours for the law to become transitory. This is the first great paradox of AI governance. Technology operates at the speed of creation. Law operates at the speed of procedure. The citizen is seated between the two. 

‍

The Age of the Digital Double

‍

Indian courts are already dealing with this issue in more tangible ways. Cricket player Yuvraj Singh recently received relief from the Delhi High Court in a personality-rights case involving deepfakes created by AI and unlawful use of his identity. Courts have intervened against AI-generated and modified content in similar cases involving other public individuals. As a result, the law faces an odd dilemma: What exactly belongs to a person?  In the past, humans used comparatively stable identifiers to understand identity, such as a name, portrait, signature, or voice. That simplicity has been disrupted by AI. You can now detach your face from your body. You may separate your throat from your voice. It is possible to distinguish between your emotions and your expressions. It is possible to fabricate your political beliefs without engaging in politics. The legitimacy of a person's existence is being requested to be protected by the law, not just their property which is a far more difficult issue.

‍

When Artificial Intelligence Enters the Courtroom

‍

The irony becomes richer when AI enters the courtroom itself. Courts are creating guidelines for the use of  AI in the courtroom, just as they are being challenged to decide what happens when AI creates reality outside of it. Human primacy, accountability, transparency, data protection and judicial independence are highlighted in the Supreme Court’s proposed rules on the use of AI in courts. After all, there is one situation in which the justification that “the AI said so” should never be accepted. A hallucinated judgment is more than just a mistake in technology. It may turn into a mistake of authority in a legal system. A precedent can be confidently created by a machine. It can be cited with confidence by a lawyer and maybe then brought before a court for consideration.  All of a sudden, we have created a flawless little bureaucratic ecology where everyone has been duped despite no one's intention to do so. It's not inevitable that machines will turn malevolent, but rather that people will grow unduly reliant on machines that seem authoritative.

‍

The Great AI Contradiction

‍

We asked, "What can AI do?" for years.What can AI do for us, we then enquired? We are starting to wonder what AI might do to humans. The following query ought to be more challenging: When it does, who is at fault? Because AI systems don't cleanly fit into the legal frames we inherited, that question becomes very challenging. Developers, model providers, data providers, deployers, platforms, and end users are among them. There may occasionally be a middleman. There is a victim occasionally. Surprisingly, there can occasionally be multiple roles at once. This point is made in a recent working paper on AI and consumer rights in India: while current consumer protection laws may apply to AI harms, the conventional division of accountability among manufacturers, sellers, and service providers becomes challenging when AI systems involve a much more dispersed value chain.

‍

The Misunderstanding on AI’s Intelligence

‍

This is the point at which our sense for policy sometimes fails. We are concerned that AI will develop superintelligence. The more imminent threat can be much less dramatic. It is not necessary for AI to surpass human intelligence in order to wreak great harm. All it needs to do is become more convincing, quicker, and less expensive than human verification. Artificial general intelligence is not necessary for a fraudster to con an elderly person. A supercomputer is not necessary for a political manipulator to create a candidate's voice. A stalker can create an intimate deepfake without being conscious. A pupil can file a hallucinated case citation without the assistance of a robot attorney. Ordinary human wrongdoing magnified by incredible technical magnitude is what it is.

‍

The Real Test of AI Governance

‍

The number of standards we create, the number of committees we form, or the number of compliance boxes platforms check will not ultimately determine the success of AI regulation. Something considerably simpler will be used to measure it. Can the legal system advise a regular citizen where to go, what to do, and who will be held accountable when an AI system impersonates, defrauds, surveils, manipulates, or denies them a service?

The presence of accountability following failure, not the absence of failure.

Sometimes the most advanced piece of technology in the room is still an old-fashioned institution: a law that works, a regulator that responds, a court that understands the technology and a human being willing to take responsibility. Because if AI is going to be both the fire and the fire extinguisher, we should at least make sure that someone other than the machine owns the building.

‍

References

‍

• https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/india/government-tightens-deepfake-rules-mandates-ai-content-labels-and-three-hour-takedown-timeline/articleshow/133011656.cms?utm_source=chatgpt.com&from=mdr 
• https://theleaflet.in/law-and-technology/explained-the-supreme-court-of-indias-draft-regulations-for-use-of-artificial-intelligence-in-courts-2026 
• https://www.bananaip.com/intellepedia/yuvraj-singh-personality-rights-ai-deepfakes-delhi-high-court/

‍