#FactCheck - "Deepfake Video Falsely Claims of Elon Musk conducting give away for Cryptocurrency”

Introduction

‍

The digital communication landscape in India is set to change significantly as the Department of Telecommunications is preparing to implement new rules for messaging apps that operate using SIM cards. This step is part of the government’s effort to tackle cybercrime at its roots by enforcing stricter verification and reducing the number of communication platforms that can be misused. One clear change that users will notice is that WhatsApp Web sessions will now be automatically logged out every six hours, disrupting the previously uninterrupted use across multiple devices. Although this may appear to be a simple inconvenience, the measure is part of a broader plan to address the growing problem of cyber fraud. Cybercriminals exploit messaging apps like WhatsApp without keeping the registered SIM in the device, making it difficult to trace fraud. These efforts are surely gonna address these challenges at the root.

‍

The Incident: What Has Changed?

‍

The new regulations will make it mandatory for messaging platforms to create a direct link between user accounts and verified SIM identities. By this method, every account in the network can be associated with a valid and traceable mobile number. Because of this requirement, it is expected that WhatsApp is going to tighten the management of device sessions. The six-hour logout cycle for WhatsApp Web is implemented to prevent long-lived and unmonitored sessions that are sometimes taken advantage of in account takeovers, device-based breaches, and remote access scams. This change significantly affects the user experience. WhatsApp Web, often used for communication, customer support, and coordination, will now require more frequent authentication through mobile devices. Though mobile access remains uninterrupted, desktop and browser-linked sessions will be subjected to tighter security controls.

‍

Why Identity-Linked Messaging Matters

‍

India is facing a rapidly evolving cybercrime ecosystem in which messaging applications play a central role. Scammers often rely on fake, unverified, or illegally obtained SIM cards to create temporary accounts that can be used for various illegal activities, such as sending phishing messages, impersonating government officials, and deceiving victims through call centres set up for scams.

The new rules take into consideration the following main issues:

1. Anonymity of accounts makes large-scale fraud possible: Criminals operate bulk scams using hundreds of SIM-linked accounts.
2. Freedom to drop identities: Illegal SIMs are discarded after fraud, making it difficult for the police to trace the criminals.
3. Multi-device vulnerabilities that last for a long time: Access without permission to WhatsApp Web sessions that last for a long time is seen as the main reason for OTP theft, account hijacking, and on-device social engineering.

The government wants to disrupt these foundations by enforcing stricter traceability.

‍

A Sector Under Strain: Misuse of Messaging Platforms

‍

Messaging apps have turned out to be the most important thing in India's digital life, from communication to enterprise. This very widespread use of messaging apps has made them an easy target for cybercriminals.

The scams that are frequently visible are:

• WhatsApp groupsare  used for job and loan scams
• False communication from banks, government departments, and payment applications
• Sextortion and blackmail through unverified accounts
• Remote-access fraud with attackers who are watching WhatsApp Web sessions
• Coordinated spread of false information and distribution of deepfake videos

The employment of AI-generated personas and "SIM farms" has made it harder to secure the systems even more. Unless there is a very strict linking of users to authenticated SIM credentials, the platforms might degenerate into uncontrollable rafts of cybercrime.

‍

Government and Regulatory Response

‍

The Department of Telecommunications is initiating a process of stricter compliance measures and cooperating with the Ministry of Home Affairs, along with the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre. The main points of the directions include the following:

• Identity verification linked to a SIM is mandatory for the creation of messaging accounts
• Device re-authentication on platforms often starts with WhatsApp Web
• Coordination with the telecom operators to the extent of getting suspicious login patterns
• Protocols for the sharing of data with law enforcement in the course of cybercrime investigations
• Compliance checks of digital platforms to verify adherence to national safety guidelines

This coordinated effort reflects the understanding that the security of communication platforms is the responsibility of both the regulators and the service providers.

‍

The Bigger Picture: Strengthening India’s Digital Trust

‍

The fresh regulations are in step with the worldwide trend where the platforms of messaging have to be more responsible, as governments are demanding more and more from them. The same discussions are going on in the EU, UK, and certain Southeast Asian regions. 

For India, it is imperative to enhance identity management because: 

• The nation has the largest base of messaging users in the whole world
• Cybercrime is increasing at a rate quicker than that of traditional crime 
• Digital government services rely on communications that are secure 
• Identity integrity is the basis for trust in online transactions and digital payments

The six-hour logout policy for WhatsApp Web is a small action, but it is an indication of a bigger transformation towards a regulation that is active rather than just policing that is reactive.

‍

What Needs to Happen Next?

‍

The implementation of SIM-linked regulations must involve several subsequent measures to make them effective.

1. Strengthening Digital Literacy: It is necessary to educate users about the benefits of frequent logouts and security improvements.
2. Ensuring Privacy Protections: The DPDP Act should create a strong barrier against the misuse of personal data in identity-linked messaging that will be implemented.
3. Collaboration with Platforms: Messaging services should seek to secure authentication under the compromise of safety checks.
4. Monitoring SIM fraud at the source: Illicit SIM provisioning enforcement is the main source of criminals, not just changing their methods.
5. Continuous Review and Feedback: Policymaking needs to keep pace with real-life difficulties and new inventions in technology.

‍

Conclusion

‍

India's announcement to impose regulations on messaging apps with SIM linkage is a major step forward in preventing cybercrime from occurring in the first place. Although the immediate effect, like the six-hour logout requirement for WhatsApp Web, may annoy users, it is nevertheless part of a bigger goal: to develop a more secure and trustworthy digital communication environment.

Securing the communication that links millions of people is vital as India becomes more and more digital. Through a combination of regulatory measures, technological protection, and user education, the country is headed toward a time when criminals in the cyber world will find it very difficult to operate and where consumers will be able to interact online with much more confidence and safety.

‍

References

‍

• https://thehackernews.com/2025/12/india-orders-messaging-apps-to-work.html
• https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/explained-sci-tech/whatsapp-web-automatic-log-out-six-hourse-reason-10394142/
• https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/explained-how-will-new-sim-binding-rule-affect-whatsapp-signal-telegram-9728710
• https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/no-whatsapp-without-active-sim-centre-issues-new-rules-dot-sim-binding-prevent-cyber-crimes-101764495810135.html

‍

Introduction

The term ‘super spreader’ is used to refer to social media and digital platform accounts that are able to quickly transmit information to a significantly large audience base in a short duration. The analogy references the medical term, where a small group of individuals is able to rapidly amplify the spread of an infection across a huge population. The fact that a few handful accounts are able to impact and influence many is attributed to a number of factors like large follower bases, high engagement rates, content attractiveness or virality and perceived credibility.

Super spreader accounts have become a considerable threat on social media because they are responsible for generating a large amount of low-credibility material online. These individuals or groups may create or disseminate low-credibility content for a number of reasons, running from social media fame to garnering political influence, from intentionally spreading propaganda to seeking financial gains. Given the exponential reach of these accounts, identifying, tracing and categorising such accounts as the sources of misinformation can be tricky. It can be equally difficult to actually recognise the content they spread for the misinformation that it actually is. 

How Do A Few Accounts Spark Widespread Misinformation? 

Recent research suggests that misinformation superspreaders, who consistently distribute low-credibility content, may be the primary cause of the issue of widespread misinformation about different topics. A study[1] by a team of social media analysts at Indiana University has found that a significant portion of tweets spreading misinformation are sent by a small percentage of a given user base. The researchers conducted a review of 2,397,388 tweets posted on Twitter (now X) that were flagged as having low credibility and details on who was sending them. The study found that it does not take a lot of influencers to sway the beliefs and opinions of large numbers. This is attributed to the impact of what they describe as superspreaders. The researchers collected 10 months of data, which added up to 2,397,388 tweets sent by 448,103 users, and then reviewed it, looking for tweets that were flagged as containing low-credibility information. They found that approximately a third of the low-credibility tweets had been posted by people using just 10 accounts, and that just 1,000 accounts were responsible for posting approximately 70% of such tweets.[2]

Case Study

1. How Misinformation ‘Superspreaders’ Seed False Election Theories

During the 2020 U.S. presidential election, a small group of "repeat spreaders" aggressively pushed false election claims across various social media platforms for political gain, and this even led to rallies and radicalisation in the U.S.[3] Superspreaders accounts were responsible for disseminating a disproportionately large amount of misinformation related to the election, influencing public opinion and potentially undermining the electoral process.

In the domestic context, India was ranked highest for the risk of misinformation and disinformation according to experts surveyed for the World Economic Forum’s 2024 Global Risk Report. In today's digital age, misinformation, deep fakes, and AI-generated fakes pose a significant threat to the integrity of elections and democratic processes worldwide. With 64 countries conducting elections in 2024, the dissemination of false information carries grave implications that could influence outcomes and shape long-term socio-political landscapes. During the 2024 Indian elections, we witnessed a notable surge in deepfake videos of political personalities, raising concerns about the influence of misinformation on election outcomes.

2. Role of Superspreaders During Covid-19

Clarity in public health communication is important when any grey areas or gaps in information can be manipulated so quickly. During the COVID-19 pandemic, misinformation related to the virus, vaccines, and public health measures spread rapidly on social media platforms, including Twitter (Now X). Some prominent accounts or popular pages on platforms like Facebook and Twitter(now X) were identified as superspreaders of COVID-19 misinformation, contributing to public confusion and potentially hindering efforts to combat the pandemic.

As per the Center for Countering Digital Hate Inc (US), The "disinformation dozen," a group of 12 prominent anti-vaccine accounts[4], were found to be responsible for a large amount of anti-vaccine content circulating on social media platforms, highlighting the significant role of superspreaders in influencing public perceptions and behaviours during a health crisis.

There are also incidents where users are unknowingly engaged in spreading misinformation by forwarding information or content which are not always shared by the original source but often just propagated by amplifiers, using other sources, websites, or YouTube videos that help in dissemination. The intermediary sharers amplify these messages on their pages, which is where it takes off. Hence such users do not always have to be the ones creating or deliberately popularising the misinformation, but they are the ones who expose more people to it because of their broad reach. This was observed during the pandemic when a handful of people were able to create a heavy digital impact sharing vaccine/virus-related misinformation. 

3. Role of Superspreaders in Influencing Investments and Finance

Misinformation and rumours in finance may have a considerable influence on stock markets, investor behaviour, and national financial stability. Individuals or accounts with huge followings or influence in the financial niche can operate as superspreaders of erroneous information, potentially leading to market manipulation, panic selling, or incorrect impressions about individual firms or investments.

Superspreaders in the finance domain can cause volatility in markets, affect investor confidence, and even trigger regulatory responses to address the spread of false information that may harm market integrity. In fact, there has been a rise in deepfake videos, and fake endorsements, with multiple social media profiles providing unsanctioned investing advice and directing followers to particular channels. This leads investors into dangerous financial decisions. The issue intensifies when scammers employ deepfake videos of notable personalities to boost their reputation and can actually shape people’s financial decisions. 

Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media

Bots are automated accounts that are designed to execute certain activities, such as liking, sharing, or retweeting material, and they can broaden the reach of misinformation by swiftly spreading false narratives and adding to the virality of a certain piece of content. They can also artificially boost the popularity of disinformation by posting phony likes, shares, and comments, making it look more genuine and trustworthy to unsuspecting users. Bots can exploit social network algorithms by establishing false identities that interact with one another and with real users, increasing the spread of disinformation and pushing it to the top of users' feeds and search results.

Bots can use current topics or hashtags to introduce misinformation into popular conversations, allowing misleading information to acquire traction and reach a broader audience. They can lead to the construction of echo chambers, in which users are exposed to a narrow variety of perspectives and information, exacerbating the spread of disinformation inside restricted online groups. There are incidents reported where bot's were found as the sharers of content from low-credibility sources.

Bots are frequently employed as part of planned misinformation campaigns designed to propagate false information for political, ideological, or commercial gain. Bots, by automating the distribution of misleading information, can make it impossible to trace the misinformation back to its source. Understanding how bots work and their influence on information ecosystems is critical for combatting disinformation and increasing digital literacy among social media users.

CyberPeace Policy Recommendations

1. Recommendations/Advisory for Netizens:

1. Educating oneself: Netizens need to stay informed about current events, reliable fact-checking sources, misinformation counter-strategies, and common misinformation tactics, so that they can verify potentially problematic content before sharing.
2. Recognising the threats and vulnerabilities: It is important for netizens to understand the consequences of spreading or consuming inaccurate information, fake news, or misinformation. Netizens must be cautious of sensationalised content spreading on social media as it might attempt to provoke strong reactions or to mold public opinions. Netizens must consider questioning the credibility of information, verifying its sources, and developing cognitive skills to identify low-credibility content and counter misinformation.
3. Practice caution and skepticism: Netizens are advised to develop a healthy skepticism towards online information, and critically analyse the veracity of all information sources. Before spreading any strong opinions or claims, one must seek supporting evidence,  factual data, and expert opinions, and verify and validate claims with reliable sources or fact-checking entities.
4. Good netiquette on the Internet, thinking before forwarding any information: It is important for netizens to practice good netiquette in the online information landscape. One must exercise caution while sharing any information, especially if the information seems incorrect, unverified or controversial. It's important to critically examine facts and recognise and understand the implications of sharing false, manipulative, misleading or fake information/content. Netizens must also promote critical thinking and encourage their loved ones to think critically, verify information, seek reliable sources and counter misinformation.
5. Adopting and promoting Prebunking and Debunking strategies: Prebunking and debunking are two effective strategies to counter misinformation. Netizens are advised to engage in sharing only accurate information and do fact-checking to debunk any misinformation. They can rely on reputable fact-checking experts/entities who are regularly engaged in producing prebunking and debunking reports and material. Netizens are further advised to familiarise themselves with fact-checking websites, and resources and verify the information.

2. Recommendations for tech/social media platforms 

1. Detect, report and block malicious accounts: Tech/social media platforms must implement strict user authentication mechanisms to verify account holders' identities to minimise the formation of fraudulent or malicious accounts. This is imperative to weed out suspicious social media accounts, misinformation superspreader accounts and bots accounts. Platforms must be capable of analysing public content, especially viral or suspicious content to ascertain whether it is misleading, AI-generated, fake or deliberately misleading. Upon detection, platform operators must block malicious/ superspreader accounts. The same approach must apply to other community guidelines’ violations as well. 
2. Algorithm Improvements: Tech/social media platform operators must develop and deploy advanced algorithm mechanisms to detect suspicious accounts and recognise repetitive posting of misinformation. They can utilise advanced algorithms to identify such patterns and flag any misleading, inaccurate, or fake information.
3. Dedicated Reporting Tools: It is important for the tech/social media platforms to adopt robust policies to take action against social media accounts engaged in malicious activities such as spreading misinformation, disinformation, and propaganda. They must empower users on the platforms to flag/report suspicious accounts, and misleading content or misinformation through user-friendly reporting tools.
4. Holistic Approach: The battle against online mis/disinformation necessitates a thorough examination of the processes through which it spreads. This involves investing in information literacy education, modifying algorithms to provide exposure to varied viewpoints, and working on detecting malevolent bots that spread misleading information. Social media sites can employ similar algorithms internally to eliminate accounts that appear to be bots. All stakeholders must encourage digital literacy efforts that enable consumers to critically analyse information, verify sources, and report suspect content. Implementing prebunking and debunking strategies. These efforts can be further supported by collaboration with relevant entities such as cybersecurity experts, fact-checking entities, researchers, policy analysts and the government to combat the misinformation warfare on the Internet.  

References:

1. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302201 {1}
2. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette {2}
3. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette {3}
4. https://counterhate.com/research/the-disinformation-dozen/ {4}
5. https://phys.org/news/2024-05-superspreaders-responsible-large-portion-misinformation.html#google_vignette
6. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302201
7. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/11/23/technology/election-misinformation-facebook-twitter.html
8. https://www.wbur.org/onpoint/2021/08/06/vaccine-misinformation-and-a-look-inside-the-disinformation-dozen
9. https://healthfeedback.org/misinformation-superspreaders-thriving-on-musk-owned-twitter/
10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8139392/
11. https://www.jmir.org/2021/5/e26933/
12. https://www.yahoo.com/news/7-ways-avoid-becoming-misinformation-121939834.html

‍

Executive Summary
‍

A digitally manipulated image of World Bank President Ajay Banga has been circulating on social media, falsely portraying him as holding a Khalistani flag. The image was shared by a Pakistan-based X (formerly Twitter) user, who also incorrectly identified Banga as the President of the International Monetary Fund (IMF), thereby fuelling misleading speculation that he supports the Khalistani movement against India.

‍

 The Claim

‍

On February 5, an X user with the handle @syedAnas0101010 posted an image allegedly showing Ajay Banga holding a Khalistani flag. The user misidentified him as the IMF President and captioned the post, “IMF president sending signals to INDIA.” The post quickly gained traction, amplifying false narratives and political speculation. Here is the link and archive link to the post, along with a screenshot:

‍

• https://x.com/syedAnas0101010/status/2019311908621545647?s=20
• https://archive.ph/DvJnd 

‍

Fact Check:

‍

To verify the authenticity of the image, the CyberPeace Fact Check Desk conducted a detailed research . The image was first subjected to a reverse image search using Google Lens, which led to a Reuters news report published on June 13, 2023. The original photograph, captured by Reuters photojournalist Jonathan Ernst, showed Ajay Banga arriving at the World Bank headquarters in Washington, D.C., on June 2, 2023, marking his first day in office. In the authentic image, Banga is seen holding a coffee cup, not a flag.

Further analysis confirmed that the viral image had been digitally altered to replace the coffee cup with a Khalistani flag, thereby misrepresenting the context and intent of the original photograph. Here is the link to the report, along with a screenshot.

‍

• https://www.reuters.com/business/finance/world-banks-new-chief-banga-sharpen-focus-projects-with-measurable-impact-2023-06-13/

‍

‍

To strengthen the findings, the altered image was also analysed using the Hive Moderation AI detection tool. The tool’s assessment indicated a high likelihood that the image contained AI-generated or manipulated elements, reinforcing the conclusion that the image was not genuine. Below is a screenshot of the result.

‍

‍

Conclusion

‍

The viral image claiming to show World Bank President Ajay Banga holding a Khalistani flag is fake. The photograph was digitally manipulated to spread misinformation and provoke political speculation.  In reality, the original Reuters image from June 2023 shows Banga holding a coffee cup during his arrival at the World Bank headquarters. The claim that he supports the Khalistani movement is false and misleading.

‍