#FactCheck- Old SCO Summit Video Misrepresented as Pakistan-Iran Meeting
Executive Summary
Amid reports of a two-week ceasefire announced on April 8, 2026, between the United States and Iran, and claims that Pakistan is facilitating peace talks between the two nations, a video showing leaders of Pakistan and Iran meeting has gone viral on social media. The video is being shared with the claim that Pakistani leaders received a grand welcome upon arriving in Iran for the April 11, 2026 talks. However, an research by the CyberPeace found the claim to be misleading. The viral video is not recent but dates back to September 2025.
Claim
An X (formerly Twitter) user shared the video on April 10, 2026, claiming that it shows Pakistani leaders being warmly welcomed in Iran.
Post link:
Fact Check
To verify the claim, we extracted keyframes from the viral video and conducted a reverse image search. This led us to the same video posted on a Facebook account named “Bhurgri Siddique” on September 1, 2025.
According to the available information, the video shows a meeting between a Pakistani delegation and Iranian leaders. Further keyword searches helped us locate a longer version of the same video on the official YouTube channel “HT Videos,” also uploaded on September 1, 2025. The video was from the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Summit 2025 held in China, where leaders from various member countries, including Pakistan and Iran, had met.
Conclusion
The viral claim is misleading. The video does not show any recent meeting or welcome ceremony in Iran linked to the ongoing ceasefire talks. Instead, it is an old clip from September 2025, recorded during the SCO Summit in China. There is no evidence to suggest that the footage is related to current developments between the United States, Iran, and Pakistan. The video has been taken out of context and is being reshared with a false narrative to mislead users.
Related Blogs
Executive Summary
A video is going viral on social media showing ‘injured’ security personnel being carried into ambulances. The clip is being shared with claims that a terrorist attack recently took place in Kishtwar. The video surfaced nearly a year after the terror attack in Pahalgam on April 22, 2025, adding to confusion among users online. Research by CyberPeace Research Wing found that the claim is false. The viral video is actually from a mock drill conducted in Kishtwar, not a real terror incident.
Claim
An Instagram user ‘thenewjbharat’ shared the video on April 30, 2026, claiming that a terrorist attack had taken place again in Kishtwar.
https://www.instagram.com/thenewjbharat/
Fact Check
To verify the claim, we extracted keyframes from the viral video and conducted a reverse image search using Google Lens. This led us to the same clip uploaded on April 24, 2026 by an Instagram user ‘kishtwar_breaking_news’. According to the post, the video shows a mock drill conducted by local authorities to assess emergency preparedness. Officials and rescue teams participated in the exercise.
We also found a related news video uploaded on April 23, 2026, by the YouTube channel of Daily Excelsior, which featured visuals matching the viral clip. The report confirmed that the drill was carried out to evaluate readiness for emergency situations.
Conclusion
Our research confirms that the viral video does not show a real terrorist attack. It is footage from a mock drill conducted in Kishtwar and is being falsely shared with misleading claims.
Disclaimer:
This report is the collaborative outcome of insights derived from the CyberPeace Helpline’s operational statistics and the CyberPeace Research Team, covering the monthly helpline case trends of May 2025, the report identifies recurring trends, operational challenges, and strategic opportunities. The objective is to foster research-driven solutions that enhance the overall efficacy of the helpline.
Executive Summary:
This report summarizes the cybercrime cases reported in May, offering insights into case types, gender distribution, resolution status, and geographic trends.
As per our analysis, out of various Cyber Frauds Financial Fraud was the most reported issue, making up 43% of cases, followed by Cyberbullying (26%) and Impersonation (14%). Less frequent but serious issues included Sexual Harassment, Sextortion, Hacking, Data Tampering, and Cyber Defamation, each accounting for 3–6%, highlighting a mix of financial and behavioral threats.The gender distribution was fairly balanced, with 51% male and 49% female respondents. While both genders were affected by major crimes like financial fraud and cyber bullying, some categories—such as sexual harassment—reflected more gender-specific risks, indicating the need for gender-responsive policies and support.
Regarding case status, 60% remain under follow-up while 40% have been resolved, reflecting strong case-handling efforts by the team.
The location-wise data shows higher case concentrations in Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and West Bengal, with significant reports also from Delhi, Telangana, Maharashtra, and Odisha. Reports from the northeastern and eastern states confirm the nationwide spread of cyber incidents.In conclusion, the findings point to a growing need for enhanced cybersecurity awareness, preventive strategies, and robust digital safeguards to address the evolving cyber threat landscape across India.
Cases Received in May:
As per the given dataset, the following types of cases were reported to our team during the month of May:
- 💰 Financial Fraud – 43%
- 💬 Cyber Bullying – 26%
- 🕵️♂️ Impersonation – 14%
- 🚫 Sexual Harassment – 6%
- 📸 Sextortion – 3%
- 💻 Hacking – 3%
- 📝 Data Tampering – 3%
- 🗣️ Cyber Defamation – 3%
The chart illustrates various cybercrime categories and their occurrence rates. Financial Fraud emerges as the most common, accounting for 43% of cases, highlighting the critical need for stronger digital financial security. This is followed by Cyber Bullying at 26%, reflecting growing concerns around online harassment, especially among youth. Impersonation ranks third with 14%, involving identity misuse for deceitful purposes. Less frequent but still serious crimes such as Sexual Harassment (6%), Sextortion, Hacking, Data Tampering, and Cyber Defamation (each 3%) also pose significant risks to users’ privacy and safety. Overall, the data underscores the need for improved cybersecurity awareness, legal safeguards, and preventive measures to address both financial and behavioral threats in the digital space.
Gender-Wise Distribution:
- 👨 Male – 51%
- 👩 Female – 49%
The chart illustrates the distribution of respondents by gender. The data shows that Male participants make up 51% of the total, while Female participants account for 49%. This indicates a fairly balanced representation of both genders, with a slight majority of male respondents.
Gender-Wise Case Distribution:
- The chart presents a gender-wise distribution of various cybercrime cases, offering a comparative view of how different types of cyber incidents affect males and females.
- It highlights that both genders are significantly impacted by cybercrimes such as financial fraud and cyber bullying, indicating a widespread risk across the board.
- Certain categories, including sexual harassment, cyber defamation, and hacking, show more gender-specific patterns of victimization, pointing to differing vulnerabilities.
- The data suggests the need for gender-sensitive policies and preventive measures to effectively address the unique risks faced by males and females in the digital space.
- These insights can inform the design of tailored awareness programs, support services, and intervention strategies aimed at improving cybersecurity for all individuals.
Major Location Wise Distribution:
The map visualization displays location-wise distribution of reported cases across India. The cases reflect the cyber-related incidents or cases mapped geographically.
The map highlights the regional distribution of cybercrime cases across Indian states, with a higher concentration in Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and West Bengal. States like Delhi, Telangana, Maharashtra, and Odisha also show notable activity, indicating widespread cyber threats. Regions including Assam, Tripura, Bihar, Jharkhand, and Jammu & Kashmir further reflect the pan-India spread of such incidents. This distribution stresses the need for targeted cybersecurity awareness and stronger digital safeguards nationwide
CyberPeace Advisory:
- Use Strong and Unique Passwords: Create complex passwords using a mix of letters, numbers, and symbols. Avoid reusing the same password across multiple platforms.
- Enable Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Add an extra layer of security by using a second verification step like an OTP or authentication app.
- Keep Software Updated: Regularly update your operating system, apps, and security tools to protect against known vulnerabilities.
- Install Trusted Security Software: Use reliable antivirus and anti-malware programs to detect and block threats.
- Limit Information Sharing: Be cautious about sharing personal or sensitive details, especially on social media or public platforms.
- Secure Your Network: Protect your Wi-Fi with a strong password and encryption. Avoid accessing confidential information on public networks.
- Back Up Important Data: Regularly save copies of important files in secure storage to prevent data loss in case of an attack.
- Stay Informed with Cybersecurity Training: Learn how to identify scams, phishing attempts, and other online threats through regular awareness sessions.
- Control Access to Data: Give access to sensitive information only to those who need it, based on their job roles.
- Monitor and Respond to Threats: Continuously monitor systems for unusual activity and have a clear response plan for handling security incidents.
- CyberPeace Helpline mail ID: helpline@cyberpeace.net
- CyberPeace Helpline Number: 9570000066
- Central Government Helpline: https://cybercrime.gov.in/
- Central Government Helpline Number: 1930
Conclusion
The cybercrime cases reported in May highlight a diverse and evolving threat landscape across India. Financial fraud, cyber bullying, and impersonation are the most prevalent, affecting both genders almost equally, though some crimes like sexual harassment call for targeted gender-sensitive measures. With 60% of cases still under follow-up, the team’s efforts in investigation and resolution remain strong. Geographically, cyber incidents are widespread, with higher concentrations in several key states, demonstrating that no region is immune. These findings underscore the urgent need to enhance cybersecurity awareness, strengthen preventive strategies, and build robust digital safeguards. Proactive and inclusive approaches are essential to protect individuals and communities and to address the growing challenges posed by cybercrime nationwide.
Executive Summary
Two powerful earthquakes measuring 7.2 and 7.5 in magnitude struck Venezuela on June 24, 2026, within a span of one minute, causing widespread destruction. Hundreds of buildings were reportedly reduced to rubble. Against this backdrop, a video is being widely shared on social media showing two high-rise buildings colliding with each other before collapsing. Several users have claimed that the footage shows the aftermath of the recent earthquake in Venezuela. CyberPeace Research Wing team conducted a detailed research and found that the viral video is not authentic. The footage was generated using artificial intelligence and is being falsely shared as real visuals from the Venezuela earthquake.
Claim
A Facebook user, “Rana Yashwant,” shared the video on June 26, 2026, with the caption: "Venezuela: The high-rise buildings fell as if they were fast-moving train coaches. How long could they withstand such a powerful earthquake? Both collapsed face-first. What happened to the people? Who knows." https://www.facebook.com/reel/1036186612182534 ,https://perma.cc/98PE-DFKB
Fact Check
We first extracted several keyframes from the viral video and conducted reverse image searches using Google Lens. However, we found no credible news reports or evidence linking the footage to the recent earthquakes in Venezuela. A closer examination of the video revealed several anomalies. Despite the intense shaking and collision of the buildings, the windows and structural features remained unchanged throughout the footage. No visible deformation or damage appeared in the buildings before they collapsed, which is highly unrealistic and raised suspicions that the video had been generated using AI. To verify this, we analyzed the video using the AI detection tool detectvideo.ai. The results indicated a 73 percent probability that the footage was AI-generated.
Similarly, analysis conducted using Sightengine found a 99 percent probability that the video had been created using artificial intelligence.
Conclusion
Our research found the viral claim to be false. The video showing two buildings colliding and collapsing is not related to the recent earthquakes in Venezuela. The footage was generated using artificial intelligence and is being misleadingly shared as real disaster footage.
