#FactCheck - Digitally Altered Video of Olympic Medalist, Arshad Nadeem’s Independence Day Message
Executive Summary:
A video of Pakistani Olympic gold medalist and Javelin player Arshad Nadeem wishing Independence Day to the People of Pakistan, with claims of snoring audio in the background is getting viral. CyberPeace Research Team found that the viral video is digitally edited by adding the snoring sound in the background. The original video published on Arshad's Instagram account has no snoring sound where we are certain that the viral claim is false and misleading.
Claims:
A video of Pakistani Olympic gold medalist Arshad Nadeem wishing Independence Day with snoring audio in the background.
Fact Check:
Upon receiving the posts, we thoroughly checked the video, we then analyzed the video in TrueMedia, an AI Video detection tool, and found little evidence of manipulation in the voice and also in face.
We then checked the social media accounts of Arshad Nadeem, we found the video uploaded on his Instagram Account on 14th August 2024. In that video, we couldn’t hear any snoring sound.
Hence, we are certain that the claims in the viral video are fake and misleading.
Conclusion:
The viral video of Arshad Nadeem with a snoring sound in the background is false. CyberPeace Research Team confirms the sound was digitally added, as the original video on his Instagram account has no snoring sound, making the viral claim misleading.
- Claim: A snoring sound can be heard in the background of Arshad Nadeem's video wishing Independence Day to the people of Pakistan.
- Claimed on: X,
- Fact Check: Fake & Misleading
Related Blogs
Executive Summary
A video showing police personnel dancing on the streets along with civilians is going viral on social media. The clip is being shared with the claim that policemen in West Bengal were celebrating the defeat of Mamata Banerjee and the victory of the BJP.
Research by CyberPeace Research Wing found that the claim is misleading. The viral video is old and unrelated to the West Bengal elections.
Claim
An X user shared the video on April 26, 2026, alleging that police personnel were celebrating BJP’s victory. The post questioned those raising concerns over EVMs, suggesting that even police were openly rejoicing over the election outcome.
- https://x.com/Minakshishriyan/status/2051490074957930510
- https://archive.is/d81OT
Fact Check
To verify the claim, we extracted keyframes from the viral video and conducted a reverse image search. This led us to a Reddit post dated September 13, 2022, where the same video was shared. The post described it as footage from Ganesh Visarjan celebrations in India, and several users in the comments identified the location as Maharashtra.
Further research led us to a YouTube channel “Yash Arate Vlogs,” which uploaded the same video on September 10, 2022. The description stated that the clip was recorded during Ganpati immersion celebrations in Kolhapur.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0_w5t-4rmTY
We also found media reports from September 2022 indicating that during Ganesh Visarjan in Kolhapur, loud music and festive atmosphere led even on-duty police personnel to briefly join the celebrations.
Conclusion
Our research confirms that the viral video does not show any post-election celebration in West Bengal. It is an old clip from Maharashtra, recorded during Ganesh Visarjan festivities, and is being falsely shared with a misleading political claim.
Introduction
According to the Finance Ministry's data, the incidence of domestic Unified Payment Interface (UPI) fraud rose by 85% in FY 2023-24 compared to FY 2022-23. Further, as of September of FY 2024-25, 6.32 lakh fraud cases had been already reported, amounting to Rs 485 crore. The data was shared on 25th November 2024, by the Finance Ministry in response to a question in Lok Sabha’s winter session about the fraud in UPI transactions during the past three fiscal years.
Statistics
UPI Frauds and Government's Countermeasures
On the query as to measures taken by the government for safe and secure UPI transactions and prevention of fraud in the transactions, the ministry has highlighted the measures as follows:
- The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has launched the Central Payment Fraud Information Registry (CPFIR), a web-based tool for reporting payment-related frauds, operational since March 2020, and it requires requiring all Regulated Entities (RE) to report payment-related frauds to the said CPFIR.
- The Government, RBI, and National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI) have implemented various measures to prevent payment-related frauds, including UPI transaction frauds. These include device binding, two-factor authentication through PIN, daily transaction limits, and limits on use cases.
- Further, NPCI offers a fraud monitoring solution for banks, enabling them to alert and decline transactions using AI/ML models. RBI and banks are also promoting awareness through SMS, radio, and publicity on 'cyber-crime prevention'.
- The Ministry of Home Affairs has launched a National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) (www.cybercrime.gov.in) and a National Cybercrime Helpline Number 1930 to help citizens report cyber incidents, including financial fraud. Customers can also report fraud on the official websites of their bank or bank branches.
- The Department of Telecommunications has introduced the Digital Intelligence Platform (DIP) and 'Chakshu' facility on the Sanchar Saathi portal, enabling citizens to report suspected fraud messages via call, SMS, or WhatsApp.
Conclusion
UPI is India's most popular digital payment method. As of June 2024, there are around 350 million active users of the UPI in India. The Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) report indicates that ‘Online Financial Fraud’, a cyber crime category under NCRP, is the most prevalent among others. The rise of financial fraud, particularly UPI fraud is cause for alarm, the scammers use sophisticated strategies to deceive victims. It is high time for netizens to exercise caution and care with their personal and financial information, stay aware of common tactics used by fraudsters, and adhere to best security practices for secure transactions and the safe use of UPI services.
References
.webp)
Introduction
Personalised advertisements deploy a mechanism that derives from the collection of the user’s data. Although it allows for a more tailored user experience, one cannot ignore the method through which this is achieved. Recently, as per a report by the Indian Express on 13th November 2024, Meta has come up with a less personalised ad option on Facebook and Instagram for its users in the European Union (EU). This was done due to the incompatibility of their previous ad offer with the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA).
Relevant Legislation
In October 2023, Meta came up with a “Pay or Consent” option for their users in the EU. It gave the users two options: either to pay a monthly subscription fee to avail of the ad-free usage variant of Facebook and Instagram, or to give consent to see personalised ads based on the user’s data. This consent model was introduced in their attempts to comply with the EU’s DMA. However, this was found to be incompatible with the said mandate, according to the EU regulators, as they believed that the users should not only have the option to consent to ads but also have access to less personalised but equivalent alternatives. It is this decision that pushed Meta to come up with less personalised ad options for users in the EU. The less-personalised ad option claims to rely on limited data and show ads that are only based on the context of what is being viewed i.e. during a Facebook or Instagram session requiring a minimum set of data points such as location, age, gender, and the user’s engagement with the ads. However, choosing this option also allows for such ads to be less skippable.
The EU’s Digital Markets Act came into force on November 1, 2022. The purpose was to make the digital marketing sector fairer and in doing so, identify what they consider to be “Gatekeepers” (core platform services such as messenger services, search engines, and app stores) and a list of do’s and don’ts for them. One of them, applicable to the case mentioned above, is the effective consent required by the user in case the gatekeeper decides to target advertisements enabled by tracking the users' activity outside the gatekeeper's core platform services.
The Indian Context
Although no such issues have been raised in India yet, it is imperative to know that in the Indian context, the DPDP (Digital Personal Data Protection) Act 2023 governs personal data regulation. This includes rules for Data Fiduciaries (those who, alone or in partnership with others, determine the means and purpose of processing personal data), the Data Principal (those who give data), Consent Managers, and even rules regarding processing data of children.
CyberPeace Recommendations:
At the level of the user, one can take steps to ensure limited collection of personal data by following the mentioned steps:
- Review Privacy Settings- Reviewing Privacy settings for one’s online accounts and devices is a healthy practice to avoid giving unnecessary information to third-party applications.
- Private Browsing- Browsing through private mode or incognito is encouraged, as it prevents websites from tracking your activity and personal data.
- Using Ad-blockers- Certain websites have a user option to block ads when the user first visits their page. Availing of this prevents spam advertisements from the respective websites.
- Using VPN- Using Virtual Private Networks enables users to hide their IP address and their data to be encrypted, preventing third-party actors from tracking the users' online activities
- Other steps include clearing cookies and cache data and using the location-sharing feature with care.
Conclusion
Meta’s compliance with the EU’s DMA signals that social media platforms cannot circumnavigate their way around rules. Balancing the services provided while respecting user privacy is of the utmost importance. The EU has set precedence for a system that respects this and can be used as an example to help set guidelines for how other countries can continue to deal with similar issues and set standards accordingly.
References
- https://indianexpress.com/article/technology/tech-news-technology/meta-less-personalised-ads-eu-regulatory-demands-9667266/
- https://rainmaker.co.in/blog/view/the-price-of-personalization-how-targeted-advertising-breaches-data-privacy-and-challenges-the-gdprs-shield
- https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/magazine-features/fines-data-protection-violations/
- https://www.forbes.com/councils/forbestechcouncil/2023/09/01/the-landscape-of-personalized-advertising-efficiency-versus-privacy/
- https://iapp.org/news/a/pay-or-consent-personalized-ads-the-rules-and-whats-next
- https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/how-to/how-to-safeguard-privacy-in-the-era-of-personalised-ads/articleshow/102748711.cms?from=mdr
- https://www.business-standard.com/technology/tech-news/facebook-instagram-users-in-europe-can-opt-for-less-personalised-ads-124111201558_1.html
- https://digital-markets-act.ec.europa.eu/about-dma_en
