Centre Proposes New Bills for Criminal Law

Introduction

CyberPeace Chronicles is a one-stop for the latest edition of news, updates, and findings in global cyberspace. As we step into the cyberage, it is pertinent that we need to incorporate cybersecurity practices in our day-to-day activities. From laptops to automated homes and cars, we are all surrounded by technology in some form or another. Thus, with the increased dependency, we need to eradicate the scope of vulnerabilities and threats around us and create robust and sustainable safety mechanisms for us and future generations. 

‍

What, When and How? 

• WIN-RAR Update: CVE-2023-33831, a serious vulnerability, was identified in WinRAR versions prior to 6.23 in April 2023. When users attempted to access seemingly harmless files inside ZIP archives, this vulnerability allowed attackers to run arbitrary code. Cybercriminals transmitted malware families like DarkMe, GuLoader, and Remcos RAT by taking advantage of this vulnerability. It is essential to update WinRAR to version 6.23 or later in order to protect your computer and your data. Follow the following steps to secure your device -

• Checking Your Current WinRAR Version
• Downloading the Latest WinRAR Version
• Installing the Updated WinRAR
• Completing the Installation
• Verifying the Update 
• Cleaning Up 

• Indonesian Hacker Groups Target Indian Digital Infrastructure: As India geared up to host the G20 delegation as part of the Leadership Summit, various reports pointed towards different forms and intensity-based cyber attacks on Indian organisations and digital infrastructure. Tech firms in India have been successful in tracing the origination of the attacks to be from Indonesia. It is believed that hacker groups backed by anti-India elements have been trying to target the digital resources of India. Organisations and central agencies like Computer Emergency Response Team (CERT-In), National Critical Information Infrastructure Protection Centre (NCIIPC), I4C (Indian Cybercrime Coordination Centre), Delhi Police, Intelligence Bureau (IB), Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW), National Investigation Agency (NIA) and Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) have constantly been working in keeping the Digital interests of India safe and secure, and with the ongoing G20 summit, it is very pertinent to be mindful of potential threats prevailing to prepare counter tactics for the same. 
• CLOP Ransomware: The CL0P ransomware is thought to have initially surfaced in 2019 and was developed by a cybercriminal organisation that spoke Russian. The threat actor FIN11 (also known as TA505 and Snakefly), who is notorious for being financially driven, is frequently connected to the CL0P ransomware, which had its roots at the beginning of 2019. By utilising this technique, CL0P has targeted businesses utilising the "Accellion FTA" file transfer appliance's vulnerable version. Accordingly, it has been asserted that the following vulnerabilities have been used to access victim data and maybe switch to victim networks. Numerous well-publicized attacks carried out by CL0P have had an impact on organisations all across the world. Especially for Managed File Transfer (MFT) programmes, the CL0P performers are well known for their talent in developing zero-day vulnerabilities. The gang went after Accellion File Transfer Appliance (FTA) devices in both 2020 and 2021, then early in 2023, they went after Fortran/Linoma GoAnywhere MFT servers, and then later in June, they went after MOVEit transfer deployments. Up to 500 organisations are thought to have been harmed by this aggressive operation. Some of the ways to mitigate the risk are as follows: 

• Regular Software Updates: Updating programmes and systems helps prevent known security flaws that fraudsters frequently exploit.
• Employee Training: Employee training can significantly lower the likelihood of successful penetration by educating staff members about phishing scams and safe internet conduct.
• Network Segmentation: By separating networks and restricting lateral movement, a ransomware attack's potential effects can be reduced.
• Regular Data backups: Data backups can lessen the effects of encryption and deter payment by regularly backing up data and storing it offsite.
• Security solutions: Putting in place effective cybersecurity measures like firewalls, intrusion detection systems, and cutting-edge endpoint protection can greatly improve an organisation's defences.

• Increased scrutiny for SIM card vendors: As phishing and smishing scams are on the rise in India, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) has repeatedly issued notifications and consultation papers to address this growing concern. Earlier this year, TRAI notified that promotional calling will not be continued from 10-digit personal numbers. Instead, companies will now have to take authorised 9-digit numbers for promotional calls and SMSs. Similarly, to increase the efficiency of the same, TRAI has laid down that all the SIM card vendors will now have to be verified again, and any discrepancy found against any of the vendors will lead to blacklisting and penal actions against the vendor. 

‍

Conclusion

In conclusion, the digital landscape in 2023 is rife with both opportunities and challenges. The recent discovery of a critical vulnerability in WinRAR underscores the importance of regularly updating software to protect against malicious attacks. It is imperative for users to follow the provided steps to secure their devices and safeguard their data. Furthermore, the cyber threat landscape continues to evolve, with Indonesian hacker groups targeting Indian digital infrastructure, particularly during significant events like the G20 summit. Indian organisations and cybersecurity agencies are working diligently to defend against these threats and ensure the security of digital assets. The emergence of ransomware attacks, exemplified by the CL0P ransomware, serves as a stark reminder of the need for robust cybersecurity measures. Regular software updates, employee training, network segmentation, data backups, and advanced security solutions are crucial components of a comprehensive defence strategy against ransomware and other cyber threats. Additionally, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India's efforts to enhance security in the telecommunications sector, such as stricter verification of SIM card vendors, demonstrate a proactive approach to addressing the rising threat of phishing and smishing scams. In this dynamic digital landscape, staying informed and implementing proactive cybersecurity measures is essential for individuals, organisations, and nations to protect their digital assets and maintain a secure online environment. Vigilance, collaboration, and ongoing adaptation are key to meeting the challenges posed by cyber threats in 2023 and beyond.

‍

Executive Summary:

The picture of a boy making sand art of Indian Cricketer Virat Kohli spreading in social media, claims to be false. The picture which was portrayed, revealed not to be a real sand art. The analyses using AI technology like 'Hive' and ‘Content at scale AI detection’ confirms that the images are entirely generated by artificial intelligence. The netizens are sharing these pictures in social media without knowing  that it is computer generated by deep fake techniques. 

‍

‍

Claims:

The collage of  beautiful pictures displays a young boy creating sand art of Indian Cricketer Virat Kohli.

‍

Post link

‍

‍

Post link

‍

‍

Post link

‍

‍

          Post link

‍

Fact Check:

When we checked on the posts, we found some anomalies in each photo. Those anomalies are common in AI-generated images.

‍

The anomalies such as the abnormal shape of the child’s feet, blended logo with sand color in the second image, and the wrong spelling ‘spoot’ instead of ‘sport’n were seen in the picture. The cricket bat is straight which in the case of sand made portrait it’s odd. In the left hand of the child, there’s a tattoo imprinted while in other photos the child's left hand has no tattoo. Additionally, the face of the boy in the second image does not match the face in other images. These made us more suspicious of the images being a synthetic media. 

‍

We then checked on an AI-generated image detection tool named, ‘Hive’. Hive was found to be 99.99% AI-generated. We then checked from another detection tool named, “Content at scale”

‍

‍

Hence, we conclude that the viral collage of images is AI-generated but not sand art of any child. The Claim made is false and misleading.

‍

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the claim that the pictures showing a sand art image of Indian cricket star Virat Kohli made by a child is false. Using an AI technology detection tool and analyzing the photos, it appears that they were probably created by an AI image-generated tool rather than by a real sand artist. Therefore, the images do not accurately represent the alleged claim and creator.

‍

Claim:  A young boy has created sand art of Indian Cricketer Virat Kohli

‍

Claimed on: X, Facebook, Instagram

‍

Fact Check: Fake & Misleading

‍

Introduction

In an era when misinformation spreads like wildfire across the digital landscape, the need for effective strategies to counteract these challenges has grown exponentially in a very short period. Prebunking and Debunking are two approaches for countering the growing spread of misinformation online. Prebunking empowers individuals by teaching them to discern between true and false information and acts as a protective layer that comes into play even before people encounter malicious content. Debunking is the correction of false or misleading claims after exposure, aiming to undo or reverse the effects of a particular piece of misinformation. Debunking includes methods such as fact-checking, algorithmic correction on a platform, social correction by an individual or group of online peers, or fact-checking reports by expert organisations or journalists. An integrated approach which involves both strategies can be effective in countering the rapid spread of misinformation online.

Brief Analysis of Prebunking 

Prebunking is a proactive practice that seeks to rebut erroneous information before it spreads. The goal is to train people to critically analyse information and develop ‘cognitive immunity’ so that they are less likely to be misled when they do encounter misinformation. 

The Prebunking approach, grounded in Inoculation theory, teaches people to recognise, analyse and avoid manipulation and misleading content so that they build resilience against the same. Inoculation theory, a social psychology framework, suggests that pre-emptively conferring psychological resistance against malicious persuasion attempts can reduce susceptibility to misinformation across cultures. As the term suggests, the MO is to help the mind in the present develop resistance to influence that it may encounter in the future. Just as medical vaccines or inoculations help the body build resistance to future infections by administering weakened doses of the harm agent, inoculation theory seeks to teach people fact from fiction through exposure to examples of weak, dichotomous arguments, manipulation tactics like emotionally charged language, case studies that draw parallels between truths and distortions, and so on. In showing people the difference, inoculation theory teaches them to be on the lookout for misinformation and manipulation even, or especially, when they least expect it. 

The core difference between Prebunking and Debunking is that while the former is preventative and seeks to provide a broad-spectrum cover against misinformation, the latter is reactive and focuses on specific instances of misinformation. While Debunking is closely tied to fact-checking, Prebunking is tied to a wider range of specific interventions, some of which increase motivation to be vigilant against misinformation and others increase the ability to engage in vigilance with success.

There is much to be said in favour of the Prebunking approach because these interventions build the capacity to identify misinformation and recognise red flags However, their success in practice may vary. It might be difficult to scale up Prebunking efforts and ensure their reach to a larger audience. Sustainability is critical in ensuring that Prebunking measures maintain their impact over time. Continuous reinforcement and reminders may be required to ensure that individuals retain the skills and information they gained from the Prebunking training activities. Misinformation tactics and strategies are always evolving, so it is critical that Prebunking interventions are also flexible and agile and respond promptly to developing challenges. This may be easier said than done, but with new misinformation and cyber threats developing frequently, it is a challenge that has to be addressed for Prebunking to be a successful long-term solution. 

Encouraging people to be actively cautious while interacting with information, acquire critical thinking abilities, and reject the effect of misinformation requires a significant behavioural change over a relatively short period of time. Overcoming ingrained habits and prejudices, and countering a natural reluctance to change is no mean feat. Developing a widespread culture of information literacy requires years of social conditioning and unlearning and may pose a significant challenge to the effectiveness of Prebunking interventions. 

Brief Analysis of Debunking 

Debunking is a technique for identifying and informing people that certain news items or information are incorrect or misleading. It seeks to lessen the impact of misinformation that has already spread. The most popular kind of Debunking occurs through collaboration between fact-checking organisations and social media businesses. Journalists or other fact-checkers discover inaccurate or misleading material, and social media platforms flag or label it. Debunking is an important strategy for curtailing the spread of misinformation and promoting accuracy in the digital information ecosystem. 

Debunking interventions are crucial in combating misinformation. However, there are certain challenges associated with the same. Debunking misinformation entails critically verifying facts and promoting corrected information. However, this is difficult owing to the rising complexity of modern tools used to generate narratives that combine truth and untruth, views and facts. These advanced approaches, which include emotional spectrum elements, deepfakes, audiovisual material, and pervasive trolling, necessitate a sophisticated reaction at all levels: technological, organisational, and cultural.

Furthermore, It is impossible to debunk all misinformation at any given time, which effectively means that it is impossible to protect everyone at all times, which means that at least some innocent netizens will fall victim to manipulation despite our best efforts.  Debunking is inherently reactive in nature, addressing misinformation after it has grown extensively. This reactionary method may be less successful than proactive strategies such as Prebunking from the perspective of total harm done. Misinformation producers operate swiftly and unexpectedly, making it difficult for fact-checkers to keep up with the rapid dissemination of erroneous or misleading information. Debunking may need continuous exposure to fact-check to prevent erroneous beliefs from forming, implying that a single Debunking may not be enough to rectify misinformation.  Debunking requires time and resources, and it is not possible to disprove every piece of misinformation that circulates at any particular moment. This constraint may cause certain misinformation to go unchecked, perhaps leading to unexpected effects. The misinformation on social media can be quickly spread and may become viral faster than Debunking pieces or articles. This leads to a situation in which misinformation spreads like a virus, while the antidote to debunked facts struggles to catch up.

Prebunking vs Debunking: Comparative Analysis

Prebunking interventions seek to educate people to recognise and reject misinformation before they are exposed to actual manipulation. Prebunking offers tactics for critical examination, lessening the individuals' susceptibility to misinformation in a variety of contexts. On the other hand, Debunking interventions involve correcting specific false claims after they have been circulated. While Debunking can address individual instances of misinformation, its impact on reducing overall reliance on misinformation may be limited by the reactive nature of the approach.

CyberPeace Policy Recommendations for Tech/Social Media Platforms

With the rising threat of online misinformation, tech/social media platforms can adopt an integrated strategy that includes both Prebunking and Debunking initiatives to be deployed and supported on all platforms to empower users to recognise the manipulative messaging through Prebunking and be aware of the accuracy of misinformation through Debunking interventions. 

1. Gamified Inoculation: Tech/social media companies can encourage gamified inoculation campaigns, which is a competence-oriented approach to Prebunking misinformation. This can be effective in helping people immunise the receiver against subsequent exposures. It can empower people to build competencies to detect misinformation through gamified interventions. 
2. Promotion of Prebunking and Debunking Campaigns through Algorithm Mechanisms: Tech/social media platforms may promote and guarantee that algorithms prioritise the distribution of Prebunking materials to users, boosting educational content that strengthens resistance to misinformation. Platform operators should incorporate algorithms that prioritise the visibility of Debunking content in order to combat the spread of erroneous information and deliver proper corrections; this can eventually address and aid in Prebunking and Debunking methods to reach a bigger or targeted audience.
3. User Empowerment to Counter Misinformation: Tech/social media platforms can design user-friendly interfaces that allow people to access Prebunking materials, quizzes, and instructional information to help them improve their critical thinking abilities. Furthermore, they can incorporate simple reporting tools for flagging misinformation, as well as links to fact-checking resources and corrections.
4. Partnership with Fact-Checking/Expert Organizations: Tech/social media platforms can facilitate Prebunking and Debunking initiatives/campaigns by collaborating with fact-checking/expert organisations and promoting such initiatives at a larger scale and ultimately fighting misinformation with joint hands initiatives.

Conclusion

The threat of online misinformation is only growing with every passing day and so, deploying effective countermeasures is essential.  Prebunking and Debunking are the two such interventions. To sum up: Prebunking interventions try to increase resilience to misinformation, proactively lowering susceptibility to erroneous or misleading information and addressing broader patterns of misinformation consumption, while Debunking is effective in correcting a particular piece of misinformation and having a targeted impact on belief in individual false claims. An integrated approach involving both the methods and joint initiatives by tech/social media platforms and expert organizations can ultimately help in fighting the rising tide of online misinformation and establishing a resilient online information landscape. 

References

1. https://mark-hurlstone.github.io/THKE.22.BJP.pdf
2. https://futurefreespeech.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Empowering-Audiences-Through-%E2%80%98Prebunking-Michael-Bang-Petersen-Background-Report_formatted.pdf
3. https://newsreel.pte.hu/news/unprecedented_challenges_Debunking_disinformation
4. https://misinforeview.hks.harvard.edu/article/global-vaccination-badnews/

‍