Launch of Central Suspect Registry to Combat Cyber Crimes

Introduction

‍

Law grows by confronting its absences, it heals through its own gaps. States often find themselves navigating a shared frontier without a mutual guide or lines of law in an era of expanding digital boundaries and growing cyber damages. The United Nations General Assembly ratified the United Nations Convention against Cybercrime on December 24, 2024, and more than sixty governments were in attendance in the signing ceremony on 24th & 25th October this year, marking a moment of institutional regeneration and global commitment. 

‍

A new Lexicon for Global Order

The old liberal order is being strained by growing nationalism, economic fracturing, populism, and great-power competition as often emphasised in the works of scholars like G. John Iken berry and John Mearsheimer. Multilateral arrangements become more brittle in such circumstances. Therefore, the new cybercrimes convention represents not only a legal tool but also a resurgence of international promise, a significant win for collective governance in an uncertain time. It serves as a reminder that institutions can be rebuilt even after they have been damaged. 

‍

In Discussion: The Fabric of the Digital Polis

‍

The digital sphere has become a contentious area. On the one hand, the US and its allies support stakeholder governance, robust individual rights, and open data flows. On the other hand, nations like China and Russia describe a “post-liberal cyber order” based on state mediation, heavily regulated flows, and sovereignty. Instead of focusing on ideological dichotomies, India, which is positioned as both a rising power and a voice of the Global South, has offered a viewpoint based on supply-chain security, data localisation, and capacity creation. Thus, rather than being merely a regulation, the treaty arises from a framework of strategic recalibration. 

‍

What Changed & Why it Matters

‍

There have been regional cybercrime accords up to this point, such as the Budapest Convention. The goal of this new international convention, which is accessible to all UN members, is to standardise definitions, evidence sharing and investigation instruments. 72 states signed the Hanoi signature event in October, 2025, demonstrating an unparalleled level of scope and determination. In addition to establishing structures for cooperative investigations, extradition, and the sharing of electronic evidence, it requires signatories to criminalise acts such as fraud, unlawful access to systems, data interference, and online child exploitation. 

For the first time, a legally obligatory global architecture aims to harmonise cross-border evidence flows, mutual legal assistance, and national procedural laws. Cybercrime offers genuine promise for community defence at a time when it is no longer incidental but existential, attacks on hospitals, schools and infrastructure are now common, according to the Global Observatory.

‍

Holding the Line: India’s Deliberate Path in the Age of Cyber Multilateralism 

‍

India takes a contemplative rather than a reluctant stance towards the UN Cybercrime Treaty. Though it played an active role during the drafting sessions and lent its voice to the shaping of global cyber norms, New Delhi is yet to sign the convention. Subtle but intentional, the reluctance suggests a more comprehensive reflection, an evaluation of how international obligations correspond with domestic constitutional protections, especially the right to privacy upheld by the Supreme Court in Puttaswamy v. UOI (2017). 

Prudence is the reason for this halt. Policy circles speculate that the government is still assessing the treaty’s consequences for national data protection, surveillance regimes, and territorial sovereignty. Officials have not provided explicit justifications for India’s refusal to join. India’s position has frequently been characterised by striking a careful balance between digital sovereignty and taking part in cooperative international regimes. In earlier negotiations, India had even proposed including clauses to penalise “offensive messages” on social media, echoing the erstwhile Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000, but the suggestion found little international traction. 

Advocates for digital rights such as Raman Jit Singh Chima of Access Now have warned that ensuring that the treaty’s implementation upholds constitutional privacy principles may be necessary for India to eventually endorse it. He contends that the treaty’s wording might not entirely meet India’s legal requirements in the absence of such voluntary pledges. 

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres praised the agreement as “a powerful, legally binding instrument to strengthen our collective defences against “cybercrime” during its signing in Hanoi. The issue for India is to make sure that multilateral collaboration develops in accordance with constitutional values rather than to reject that vision. Therefore, the path forward is one of assertion rather than absence, careful march towards a cyber future that protects freedom and sovereignty. 

‍

Sources: 

• https://www.icwa.in/show_content.php?lang=1&level=3&ls_id=12244&lid=7470 
• https://www.medianama.com/2025/10/223-72-nations-un-first-cybercrime-treaty-india-abstains-privacy/ ‍
• https://therecord.media/us-declines-signing-cybercrime-treaty

Introduction  

The emergence of deepfake technology has become a significant problem in an era driven by technological growth and power. The government has reacted proactively as a result of concerns about the exploitation of this technology due to its extraordinary realism in manipulating information. The national government is in the vanguard of defending national interests, public trust, and security as the digital world changes. On the 26th of December 2023, the central government issued an advisory to businesses, highlighting how urgent it is to confront this growing threat.

The directive aims to directly address the growing concerns around Deepfakes, or misinformation driven by AI. This advice represents the result of talks that Union Minister Shri Rajeev Chandrasekhar, had with intermediaries during the course of a month-long Digital India dialogue. The main aim of the advisory is to accurately and clearly inform users about information that is forbidden, especially those listed under Rule 3(1)(b) of the IT Rules. 

Advisory

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has sent a formal recommendation to all intermediaries, requesting adherence to current IT regulations and emphasizing the need to address issues with misinformation, specifically those driven by artificial intelligence (AI), such as Deepfakes. Union Minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar released the recommendation, which highlights the necessity of communicating forbidden information in a clear and understandable manner, particularly in light of Rule 3(1)(b) of the IT Rules.

Advise on Prohibited Content Communication

According to MeitY's advice, intermediaries must transmit content that is prohibited by Rule 3(1)(b) of the IT Rules in a clear and accurate manner. This involves giving users precise details during enrollment, login, and content sharing/uploading on the website, as well as including such information in customer contracts and terms of service.

Ensuring Users Are Aware of the Rules

Digital platform suppliers are required to inform their users of the laws that are relevant to them. This covers provisions found in the IT Act of 2000 and the Indian Penal Code (IPC). Corporations should inform users of the potential consequences of breaking the restrictions outlined in Rule 3(1)(b) and should also urge users to notify any illegal activity to law enforcement.

Talks Concerning Deepfakes

For more than a month, Union Minister Rajeev Chandrasekhar had a significant talk with various platforms where they addressed the issue of "deepfakes," or computer-generated fake videos. The meeting emphasized how crucial it is that everyone abides by the laws and regulations in effect, particularly the IT Rules to prevent deepfakes from spreading.  

Addressing the Danger of Disinformation

Minister Chandrasekhar underlined the grave issue of disinformation, particularly in the context of deepfakes, which are false pieces of content produced using the latest developments such as artificial intelligence. He emphasized the dangers this deceptive data posed to internet users' security and confidence. The Minister emphasized the efficiency of the IT regulations in addressing this issue and cited the Prime Minister's caution about the risks of deepfakes.

Rule Against Spreading False Information

The Minister referred particularly to Rule 3(1)(b)(v), which states unequivocally that it is forbidden to disseminate false information, even when doing so involves cutting-edge technology like deepfakes. He called on intermediaries—the businesses that offer digital platforms—to take prompt action to take such content down from their systems. Additionally, he ensured that everyone is aware that breaking such rules has legal implications.

Analysis 

The Central Government's latest advisory on deepfake technology demonstrates a proactive strategy to deal with new issues. It also highlights the necessity of comprehensive legislation to directly regulate AI material, particularly with regard to user interests.

There is a wider regulatory vacuum for content produced by artificial intelligence, even though the current guideline concentrates on the precision and lucidity of information distribution. While some limitations are mentioned in the existing laws, there are no clear guidelines for controlling or differentiating AI-generated content.

Positively, it is laudable that the government has recognized the dangers posed by deepfakes and is making appropriate efforts to counter them. As AI technology develops, there is a chance to create thorough laws that not only solve problems but also create a supportive environment for the creation of ethical AI content. User protection, accountability, openness, and moral AI use would all benefit from such laws. This offers an opportunity for regulatory development to guarantee the successful and advantageous incorporation of AI into our digital environment.

Conclusion 

The Central Government's preemptive advice on deepfake technology shows a great dedication to tackling new risks in the digital sphere. The advice highlights the urgent need to combat deepfakes, but it also highlights the necessity for extensive legislation on content produced by artificial intelligence. The lack of clear norms offers a chance for constructive regulatory development to protect the interests of users. The advancement of AI technology necessitates the adoption of rules that promote the creation of ethical AI content, guaranteeing user protection, accountability, and transparency. This is a turning point in the evolution of regulations, making it easier to responsibly incorporate AI into our changing digital landscape.

References

• https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/tech/technology/deepfake-menace-govt-issues-advisory-to-intermediaries-to-comply-with-existing-it-rules/articleshow/106297813.cms
• https://pib.gov.in/PressReleaseIframePage.aspx?PRID=1990542#:~:text=Ministry%20of%20Electronics%20and%20Information,misinformation%20powered%20by%20AI%20%E2%80%93%20Deepfakes.
• https://www.timesnownews.com/india/centres-deepfake-warning-to-it-firms-ensure-users-dont-violate-content-rules-article-106298282#:~:text=The%20Union%20government%20on%20Tuesday,actors%2C%20businesspersons%20and%20other%20celebrities

Introduction

As we navigate the digital realm that offers unlimited opportunities, it also exposes us to potential cyber threats and scams. A recent incident involving a businessman in Pune serves as a stark reminder of this reality. The victim fell prey to a sophisticated online impersonation fraud, where a cunning criminal posed as a high-ranking official from Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL). This cautionary tale exposes the inner workings of the scam and highlights the critical need for constant vigilance in the virtual world.

Unveiling the scam

It all began with a phone call received by the victim, who lives in Taware Colony, Pune, on September 5, 2023. The caller, who identified himself as "Manish Pande, department head of HPCL," lured the victim by taking advantage of his online search for an LPG agency. With persuasive tactics, the fraudster claimed to be on the lookout for potential partners.

When a Pune man received a call on September 5, 2023. The caller, who introduced himself as “department head of HPCL”, was actually a cunning fraudster. It turns out, the victim had been searching for an LPG agency online, which the fraudster cleverly used to his advantage. In a twisted plot, the fraudster pretended to be looking for potential locations to establish a new LPG cylinder agency in Pune. 

Enthralled by the illusion

The victim fell for the scam, convinced by the mere presence of "HPCL" in the bank account's name. Firstly victim transferred Rs 14,500 online as “registration fees”. Things got worse when, without suspicion, the victim obediently transferred Rs 1,48,200 on September 11 for a so-called "dealership certificate." To add to the charade of legitimacy, the fraudster even sent the victim registration and dealership certificates via email.

Adding to the deception, the fraudster, who had targeted the victim after discovering his online inquiry, requested photos of the victim's property and personal documents, including Aadhaar and PAN cards, educational certificates, and a cancelled cheque. These seemingly legitimate requests only served to reinforce the victim's belief in the scam.

The fraudster said they were looking for a place to allot a new LPG cylinder agency in Pune and would like to see if the victim’s place fits in their criteria. The victim agreed as it was a profitable business opportunity. The fraudster called the victim to “confirm” that his documents have been verified and assured that HPCL would be allotting him an LPG cylinder agency. On September 12, the fraudster again demanded a sum of money, this time for the issuance of an "HPCL license." 

As the victim responded that he did not have the money, the fraudster insisted on an immediate payment of at least 50 per cent of the stipulated amount. So the victim transferred Rs 1,95,200 online. On the following day the 13th of September 2023, the fraudster asked the victim for the remaining amount. The victim said he would arrange the money in a few days. Meanwhile, on the same day, the victim went to the HPCL’s office in the Pune Camp area with the documents he had received through the emails. The HPCL employees confirmed these documents were fake, even though they looked very similar to the originals. The disclosure was a pivotal moment, causing the victim to fully comprehend the magnitude of the deceit and ultimately pursue further measures against the cybercriminal.

Best Practices

• Ensuring Caller Identity- Prioritize confirming the identity of anyone reaching out to you, especially when conducting financial transactions. Hold back from divulging confidential information until you have verified the credibility of the request. 
• Utilize Official Channels- Communicate with businesses or governmental organizations through their verified contact details found on their official websites or trustworthy sources. Avoid solely relying on information gathered from online searches. 
• Maintaining Skepticism with Unsolicited Communication- Exercise caution when approached by unexpected calls or emails, particularly those related to monetary transactions. Beware of manipulative tactics used by scammers to pressure swift decisions.
• Double-Check Information- To ensure accuracy, it is important to validate the information given by the caller on your own. This can be done by double-checking and cross-referencing the details with the official source. If you come across any suspicious activities, do not hesitate to report it to the proper authorities. 
• Report Suspicious Activities- Reporting can aid in conducting investigations and providing assistance to the victim and also preventing similar incidents from occurring.  It is crucially important to promptly report cyber crimes so law enforcement agencies can take appropriate action. A powerful resource available to victims of cybercrime is the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, equipped with a 24x7 helpline number, 1930. This portal serves as a centralized platform for reporting cybercrimes, including financial fraud.

Conclusion

This alarming event serves as a powerful wake-up call to the constant danger posed by online fraud. It is crucial for individuals to remain sceptical, diligently verifying the credibility of unsolicited contacts and steering clear of sharing personal information on the internet. As technology continues to evolve, so do the strategies of cyber criminals, heightening the need for users to stay on guard and knowledgeable in the complex digital world.

References:

• https://indianexpress.com/article/cities/pune/cybercriminal-posing-hindustan-petroleum-official-cheat-pune-man-9081057/
• https://www.timesnownews.com/mirror-now/crime/pune-man-duped-of-rs-3-5-lakh-by-cyber-fraudster-impersonating-hpcl-official-article-106253358