#FactCheck-Air Taxi is a prototype and is not launched to commercial public

Introduction

The nation got its first consolidated data protection regulation in the form of the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, in the month of August, and the Indian netizens got their independence in terms of data protection and privacy. The act lays heavy penalties for non-compliance with the provisions, and the same is under the jurisdiction of a Data Protection Board set up by the Central Government, which enjoys powers equivalent to a civil court. The act upholds the right to data privacy as the fundamental right under Article 19 (1)(A) and 21 of the Constitution of India. The same has been judicially supported in the form of the landmark judgement,  Jus. K.S Puttawamy vs. Union of India of 2018. Let us take a look at the impact the act will make on the Indian netizens. 

‍

What is Personal Data? 

Personal Data refers to any form of digitised data which can be directly replicated by any person. This includes email IDs, mobile numbers, health data, banking data, photos, etc. A person to whom the personal data belongs is called the Data Principle. A Data principle is anyone who is above the age of 18 years and consents to the data of children/minors. In the case of children/minors, it is mandatory for the parents or guardians to provide their express consent for the processing of personal data for all or any purposes. Any individual who is processing personal data is known as the Data Fiduciry, and individuals registered under the act may act as consent managers to make the consent transparent.  When it comes to the rights of the netizens, it is seen that the act is created with an aspect of  “Safety by Design” to secure the rights and responsibilities of the netizens. 

‍

Rights secured under the DPDP Act 2023

• Right to Grievance Redressal: The Data fiduciary and the consent manager are required to respond to the grievances of the Data Principal within a time period, which is soon to be prescribed, thus creating a blanket of responsibility for the data fiduciary and consent manager. 
• Right to Nominate: Data Principals have the right to nominate any other individual who shall, in the event of death or incapacity of the data principal, exercise his/her rights.  
• Right to access to information: The Data principal has the right to seek confirmation from Data fiduciaries regarding the processing of their personal data and the summary of the processed data as well. 
• Right to Erasure and Correction: Data principals can reach out to the data fiduciaries in order to exercise their right to correct, complete, update and erasure of their personal data.  
• Territorial Rights: The data is to be processed within India, and processing outside India should be in regard to the services provided in India. 
• Material Rights: The rights are applicable to any personal data collected in digitised form and also for the data collected in a non-digital form but subsequently digitised. 

Obligations for Data Fiduciaries 

The data fiduciaries are mandated to oblige with the following provisions in order to maintain compliance with the laws of the land and by securing the Digital rights of the netizens. 

These are the obligations of the data fiduciaries: 

• Implement technical and organisational measures to safeguard Personal Data. 
• Determine the legal grounds for processing and obtaining consent from Data principals where required. 
• Provide a privacy notice while obtaining consent from Data principals. 
• Implement a mechanism for data principals to exercise their rights.
• Implement a grievance redressal mechanism for handling the queries from Data principals. 
• Irrecoverably delete personal data after the purpose for which it was collected has expired or when the consent has been withdrawn. 
• Have a breach management policy to notify the data protection board and the data principals in accordance with prescribed timelines. 
• Sign a valid contract with Data processors to ensure key obligations are abided by them, including timely deletion of data. 

Conclusion 

As the world steps into the digital age, it is pertinent for the governments of the world to come up with efficient and effective legislation to protect cyber rights and responsibilities, but as cyberspace has no boundaries, nations need to work in synergy to protect their cyber interests and netizens. This can only begin once all nations have indigenous Cyber laws and rights to protect netizens, and the same has been addressed by the Indian Government in the form of the Digital Perosnl Data Protection Act, 2023. The future is full of emerging technologies and the evolution of cyber laws; hence, consolidating a basic legal structure now is of utmost importance and the same is expected to be strengthened in India by the soon-to-be-released Draft Digital India Bill.  

‍

Executive Summary:

A viral picture on social media showing UK police officers bowing to a group of social media leads to debates and discussions. The investigation by CyberPeace Research team found that the image is AI generated. The viral claim is false and misleading.

Claims:

A viral image on social media depicting that UK police officers bowing to a group of Muslim people on the street.

Fact Check:

The reverse image search was conducted on the viral image. It did not lead to any credible news resource or original posts that acknowledged the authenticity of the image. In the image analysis, we have found the number of anomalies that are usually found in AI generated images such as the uniform and facial expressions of the police officers image. The other anomalies such as the shadows and reflections on the officers' uniforms did not match the lighting of the scene and the facial features of the individuals in the image appeared unnaturally smooth and lacked the detail expected in real photographs.

We then analysed the image using an AI detection tool named True Media. The tools indicated that the image was highly likely to have been generated by AI.

We also checked official UK police channels and news outlets for any records or reports of such an event. No credible sources reported or documented any instance of UK police officers bowing to a group of Muslims, further confirming that the image is not based on a real event.

Conclusion:

The viral image of UK police officers bowing to a group of Muslims is AI-generated. CyberPeace Research Team confirms that the picture was artificially created, and the viral claim is misleading and false.

• Claim: UK police officers were photographed bowing to a group of Muslims.
• Claimed on: X, Website
• Fact Check: Fake & Misleading

Artificial Intelligence (AI) provides a varied range of services and continues to catch intrigue and experimentation. It has altered how we create and consume content. Specific prompts can now be used to create desired images enhancing experiences of storytelling and even education. However, as this content can influence public perception, its potential to cause misinformation must be noted as well. The realistic nature of the images can make it hard to discern as artificially generated by the untrained eye. As AI operates by analysing the data it was trained on previously to deliver, the lack of contextual knowledge and human biases (while framing prompts) also come into play. The stakes are higher whilst dabbling with subjects such as history, as there is a fine line between the creation of content with the intent of mere entertainment and the spread of misinformation owing to biases and lack of veracity left unchecked. AI-generated images enhance storytelling but can also spread misinformation, especially in historical contexts. For instance, an AI-generated image of London during the Black Death might include inaccurate details, misleading viewers about the past.

The Rise of AI-Generated Historical Images as Entertainment

Recently, generated images and videos of various historical instances along with the point of view of the people present have been floating all over the internet. Some of them include the streets of London during the Black Death in the 1300s in England, the eruption of Mount Vesuvius at Pompeii etc. Hogne and Dan, two creators who operate accounts named POV Lab and Time Traveller POV on TikTok state that they create such videos as they feel that seeing the past through a first-person perspective is an interesting way to bring history back to life while highlighting the cool parts, helping the audience learn something new. Mostly sensationalised for visual impact and storytelling, such content has been called out by historians for inconsistencies with respect to details particular of the time. Presently, artists admit to their creations being inaccurate, reasoning them to be more of an artistic interpretation than fact-checked documentaries. 

It is important to note that AI models may inaccurately depict objects (issues with lateral inversion), people(anatomical implausibilities), or scenes due to "present-ist" bias. As noted by Lauren Tilton, an associate professor of digital humanities at the University of Richmond, many AI models primarily rely on data from the last 15 years, making them prone to modern-day distortions especially when analysing and creating historical content. The idea is to spark interest rather than replace genuine historical facts while it is assumed that engagement with these images and videos is partly a product of the fascination with upcoming AI tools. Apart from this, there are also chatbots like Hello History and Charater.ai which enable simulations of interacting with historical figures that have piqued curiosity.

Although it makes for an interesting perspective, one cannot ignore that our inherent biases play a role in how we perceive the information presented. Dangerous consequences include feeding into conspiracy theories and the erasure of facts as information is geared particularly toward garnering attention and providing entertainment. Furthermore, exposure of such content to an impressionable audience with a lesser attention span increases the gravity of the matter. In such cases, information regarding the sources used for creation becomes an important factor.

Acknowledging the risks posed by AI-generated images and their susceptibility to create misinformation, the Government of Spain has taken a step in regulating the AI content created. It has passed a bill (for regulating AI-Generated content) that mandates the labelling of AI-generated images and failure to do so would warrant massive fines (up to $38 million or 7% of turnover on companies). The idea is to ensure that content creators label their content which would help to spot images that are artificially created from those that are not.

The Way Forward: Navigating AI and Misinformation

While AI-generated images make for exciting possibilities for storytelling and enabling intrigue, their potential to spread misinformation should not be overlooked. To address these challenges, certain measures should be encouraged.

1. Media Literacy and Awareness – In this day and age critical thinking and media literacy among consumers of content is imperative. Awareness, understanding, and access to tools that aid in detecting AI-generated content can prove to be helpful.
2. AI Transparency and Labeling – Implementing regulations similar to Spain’s bill on labelling content could be a guiding crutch for people who have yet to learn to tell apart AI-generated content from others.
3. Ethical AI Development – AI developers must prioritize ethical considerations in training using diverse and historically accurate datasets and sources which would minimise biases.

As AI continues to evolve, balancing innovation with responsibility is essential. By taking proactive measures in the early stages, we can harness AI's potential while safeguarding the integrity and trust of the sources while generating images.

References:

• https://www.npr.org/2023/06/07/1180768459/how-to-identify-ai-generated-deepfake-images
• https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/ai-image-misinformation-surged-google-research-finds-rcna154333
• https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy87076pdw3o
• https://newskarnataka.com/technology/government-releases-guide-to-help-citizens-identify-ai-generated-images/21052024/
• https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/04/11/1071104/ai-helping-historians-analyze-past/
• https://www.psypost.org/ai-models-struggle-with-expert-level-global-history-knowledge/
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M65IYIWlqes&t=2597s
• https://www.vice.com/en/article/people-are-creating-records-of-fake-historical-events-using-ai/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
• https://www.reuters.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/spain-impose-massive-fines-not-labelling-ai-generated-content-2025-03-11/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
• https://www.theguardian.com/film/2024/sep/13/documentary-ai-guidelines?utm_source=chatgpt.com

‍